Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Quids,


Agreed, even Tuco as reintroduced while entertaining has been implausible / inconsistent with the character we knew. Trying not to spoil but the resolution of that situation seemed far fetched. Mike has been written more consistently but he was never that entertaining.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My memory is hazy over Mike's relationship with

> Gus. Didn't he work for him as well as Saul?


Think that part of it was poorly explained in BB, but my assumption was that he was on Gus' payroll, and did odd jobs for Saul on the side. I also assumed that Mike was the one who put Saul/Walter in touch with Gus in the first place.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 10 months later...
Got box set as a gift and just watched all of it in a short space of time. Very enjoyable series. Saved reading this thread until now. As for characters, there were so many good ones. I could never bring myself to think Walt was actually bad. I suppose he was but I sort of felt he was doing things for a right reason. Of the more obscure characters, I though Declan was great.

I don't think Walt was ever fully BAD, he always had an arguably good reason for his actions, but he crossed line after line and I guess the point is that you can never go back once you've crossed a line, even when intentions were honourable.



In related news. Better Call Saul, season 2 is now on Netflix.

He arguably had good intentions during the first/second seasons... by the fourth season they had disappeared and he was consumed with greed, and it was pretty hard to see any shred of goodness within him.


Better Call Saul is good... an altogether more lighthearted affair, but have been enjoying it so far.

  • 2 months later...

Both of those are excellent.


Big Love is something a bit different, which I also thought was great. And six feet under is another (these are all HBO).


For comedy, I really enjoyed The Brink.


And my favourite thing recently was The Leftovers, although I know people that didn't get on with it.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't want to start a new thread but I feel

> another box set coming on. I wan't something

> that's finished and was thinking of either The

> Sopranos or The Wire. I've seen some of the latter

> and enjoyed it.

>

> Any suggestions?


I'm in the process of watching the Soprano's (just getting to the end of Series 4). It's definitely worth revisiting.

We're in dire need of a new box-set to binge on. If things go as they are we might have to start talking or something.


Big thumbs-up for BB, Saul, Battlestar, Making a Murderer and Narcos.


Got bored with House of Cards, aborted Fargo and OITNB very quickly. Not interested in jumper-wearing detective-noir (or re-makes), comedy or anything to do with superheroes.


What?s left?


Advice welcome - before I switch of the ?5.99/month tap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...