Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Quids,


Agreed, even Tuco as reintroduced while entertaining has been implausible / inconsistent with the character we knew. Trying not to spoil but the resolution of that situation seemed far fetched. Mike has been written more consistently but he was never that entertaining.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My memory is hazy over Mike's relationship with

> Gus. Didn't he work for him as well as Saul?


Think that part of it was poorly explained in BB, but my assumption was that he was on Gus' payroll, and did odd jobs for Saul on the side. I also assumed that Mike was the one who put Saul/Walter in touch with Gus in the first place.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 10 months later...
Got box set as a gift and just watched all of it in a short space of time. Very enjoyable series. Saved reading this thread until now. As for characters, there were so many good ones. I could never bring myself to think Walt was actually bad. I suppose he was but I sort of felt he was doing things for a right reason. Of the more obscure characters, I though Declan was great.

I don't think Walt was ever fully BAD, he always had an arguably good reason for his actions, but he crossed line after line and I guess the point is that you can never go back once you've crossed a line, even when intentions were honourable.



In related news. Better Call Saul, season 2 is now on Netflix.

He arguably had good intentions during the first/second seasons... by the fourth season they had disappeared and he was consumed with greed, and it was pretty hard to see any shred of goodness within him.


Better Call Saul is good... an altogether more lighthearted affair, but have been enjoying it so far.

  • 2 months later...

Both of those are excellent.


Big Love is something a bit different, which I also thought was great. And six feet under is another (these are all HBO).


For comedy, I really enjoyed The Brink.


And my favourite thing recently was The Leftovers, although I know people that didn't get on with it.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't want to start a new thread but I feel

> another box set coming on. I wan't something

> that's finished and was thinking of either The

> Sopranos or The Wire. I've seen some of the latter

> and enjoyed it.

>

> Any suggestions?


I'm in the process of watching the Soprano's (just getting to the end of Series 4). It's definitely worth revisiting.

We're in dire need of a new box-set to binge on. If things go as they are we might have to start talking or something.


Big thumbs-up for BB, Saul, Battlestar, Making a Murderer and Narcos.


Got bored with House of Cards, aborted Fargo and OITNB very quickly. Not interested in jumper-wearing detective-noir (or re-makes), comedy or anything to do with superheroes.


What?s left?


Advice welcome - before I switch of the ?5.99/month tap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...