Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Money taken from the poorest kids and given to the richest adults, no questions asked.


"Gutless, heartless, incompetent." Nick Clegg March 2008 speech


I posted this in the friends of goose green section to point out that they (the executive) can obviously find money for the 180grand fence, new refurbed play area and 5mill for the ED swimming pool - yet the livesey gets it.


Then my post go deleted ? Either the lib Dems have infiltrated the EDF at admin level or the chinese goverment are taking a keen interest ....so much for saying what you see.

Ok so this is the 4th time i tried to post and it keeps getting deleted. Does anyone elese think that it is a bit rich that they shut the livesey due to funding issues yet are about to spend a load of money on removing the very expensive fence in Goose Green ? It seems very odd that the Livesey gets the chop yet spending in ED carries on regardless.


"Money taken from the poorest kids and given to the richest adults, no questions asked.


"Gutless, heartless, incompetent."


That is a quote from Nick Cleggs speech yesterday, obviously about other issues but to me it does seem to relate to some of the decisions taken in Southwark - Every time I post this it gets taken down and i get accused of hijacking the Forum. last time i looked a forum was defined as such.


"A public meeting place for open discussion."


We should have gone for a judicial review, i wish i had known we could.

CWALD's post says you have three months to launch a JR from the date of the decision which I would guess is 20 Feb. If the friends are interested I'm sure that it would be possible to raise 400 quid if there was an indication it might succeed - maybe the council minutes might give a clue? My knowledge of the relevant law has already run out though.


Whilst it may be a different thread, I live in ED and I am utterly disgusted by the use of my money to remove Goose Green fencing.

  • 4 weeks later...

This was just on the Popbitch newsletter... so not sure how true it is...

-----------------------------------------------------

Livesey Museum for Children has been shut by Southwark

Council. Rio and Anton Ferdinand's mum is a big

supporter, so Southwark residents are hoping the

footballers get behind the campaign to keep it open.

-----------------------------------------------------

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
    • https://www.letslinkuk.net/ I'm interested to know why the OP didn't find this sort of scheme to work, as I would have thought it was much harder to find someone to do a direct exchange with? Does anybody else have experience of a scheme like this? Happy to be persuaded! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...