Jump to content

Rye lane walk & cycle only from 6/7


Recommended Posts

With Islington and neighbouring Bromley this week being in the top ten councils seeing a spike in COVID cases nationally, and Lambeth also having a significant increase, closing Rye Lane was clearly the right decision to help prevent an increase in Southwark.


Before lockdown, 40% of the vehicular traffic on Rye Lane was pedal cycles. Sure it's more than 2500 per day now and this will only increase with more filters going in this week, e.g. Bishopsgate and Walworth. https://roadtraffic.dft.gov.uk/manualcountpoints/86015


Telling everyone on two wheels to walk isn't going to walk on a major cycle route, you'd need police every 100m. In the short term Southwark should burn off the yellow lines etc. to reduce the perception of the kerb and then mark a 4.5m strip down the middle as a cycle track. That would make things simpler and clearer than everyone going everywhere. There's also a massive need for cycle parking to encourage all those people cycling to stop and spend, especially around Choumert Road and either side of the station.


Next Southwark is planning to make Peckham Rye east side (the bit by the Rye pub) cycle & bus only, with access for residents. Maybe the Consort/Copeland Road junction could be made into a mini-roundabout, allowing just cycle & bus access into Copeland Road, so there's a stop closer to the station.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Next Southwark is planning to make Peckham Rye east side (the bit by the Rye pub) cycle & bus only"


How will this work as the only way to go to Nunhead if you come from the direction of Forest Hill (including if you come along Barry Road) is to go to the turn at the coop building in Peckham, come back on yourself and the go along the east side and turn left towards Nunhead


Equally if you are coming from the Copeland Road direction and want to go to East Dulwich Road (or beyond) you can't currently turn left or right at the East Dulwich Road / Peckham Rye junction so you have to go along the east side, turn right at the lights and approach the junction that way.


Closing of the east side will cause major issues going anywhere which will see cars being forced to use side roads to get to their destination.


Very badly thought through by the council as it is systematically cutting East Dulwich off from its neighbouring areas without thinking of the impacts on other roads or how the disabled and elderly will travel.


Let's prey what you you suggest above simply isn't true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where have you found out about these plans from?


rollflick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> With Islington and neighbouring Bromley this week

> being in the top ten councils seeing a spike in

> COVID cases nationally, and Lambeth also having a

> significant increase, closing Rye Lane was clearly

> the right decision to help prevent an increase in

> Southwark.

>

> Before lockdown, 40% of the vehicular traffic on

> Rye Lane was pedal cycles. Sure it's more than

> 2500 per day now and this will only increase with

> more filters going in this week, e.g. Bishopsgate

> and Walworth.

> https://roadtraffic.dft.gov.uk/manualcountpoints/8

> 6015

>

> Telling everyone on two wheels to walk isn't going

> to walk on a major cycle route, you'd need police

> every 100m. In the short term Southwark should

> burn off the yellow lines etc. to reduce the

> perception of the kerb and then mark a 4.5m strip

> down the middle as a cycle track. That would make

> things simpler and clearer than everyone going

> everywhere. There's also a massive need for cycle

> parking to encourage all those people cycling to

> stop and spend, especially around Choumert Road

> and either side of the station.

>

> Next Southwark is planning to make Peckham Rye

> east side (the bit by the Rye pub) cycle & bus

> only, with access for residents. Maybe the

> Consort/Copeland Road junction could be made into

> a mini-roundabout, allowing just cycle & bus

> access into Copeland Road, so there's a stop

> closer to the station.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KK, I am going to say it. You are being hysterical and worse than that, dismissing my objective experience as someone who cycles up and down Rye Lane most days.


The thing about shared spaces is that they are just that. A random meandering of different users. It often looks chaotic when actually it is not. Have there been a run of collisions on the far more densely shared stretch at the top of Rye Lane over the years? No there haven't. What there has been however, are a lot of cyclists and pedestrians alike, complaining about having their assumed right of way impeded.


The reality is that for any complaint, pretty much all shared space users observe an appropriate caution they would not otherwise. If they didn't, shared spaces would never work anywhere. All the evidence however shows they quite clearly do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you make a sensible point Rollflick around the perception of the kerb vs road. Only when there is no hierarchy between the two, does the space become genuinely shared. Pedestrians automatically check a road before stepping onto it in the main. This encourages an automatic right of way to continue to exist in the minds of some cyclists. SO that has to be addressed I think. Cyclists who don't want to engage in the shared space mantra can still use the surrounding roads in the normal way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First cycle down Rye Lane this week (there and back, 8am and 7.30pm).


Was a bit nervous having seen this thread but no issues with shared space that I saw. Plenty of pedestrians using the road, no crazy cyclists. There was a massive bin lorry driving in the middle of the road on way home so it?s still open to some council traffic. And shops were a lot busier than last week which is good to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is 1/3 of us will not go back to the office before Christmas and many of us (me included) will work from home for the time I'm in my present employment (which I'm lucky still to have many don't). A pedestrianised Rye Lane might be nicer if you're spending more time at home.


The bit going past my flat is not blocked off so there's no direct change for me and night screamers make the most noise these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was down the lane at weekend with my child and had to go onto the road to keep a distance from other pedestrians. Had to dodge a few cyclists and scooters travelling at speed, heard one cyclist shouting at why people are walking in road. Can't see why they can't put barriers along both sides of the pavements which would be helpful. At the moment just looks like a free for all. It's not very comfortable
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it's not very comfortable shopping in Rye Lane now wonderwoman!


Bike riders and now the electronic scooters suddenly coming at you at speed as if I'm the person in the wrong!


These people are usually just passing by on the cycle lanes etc. put in place by Southwark and don't contribute to the area at all in any way. Shame on Southwark Council!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wonderwoman & Clutterqueen, you may both be mistaken - in fact you may both be hysterical and dismissing cyclists daily experience. Take time to reconsider what you actually experienced before amending your posts accordingly.



Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KK, I am going to say it. You are being hysterical

> and worse than that, dismissing my objective

> experience as someone who cycles up and down Rye

> Lane most days.

>

> The thing about shared spaces is that they are

> just that. A random meandering of different users.

> It often looks chaotic when actually it is not.

> Have there been a run of collisions on the far

> more densely shared stretch at the top of Rye Lane

> over the years? No there haven't. What there has

> been however, are a lot of cyclists and

> pedestrians alike, complaining about having their

> assumed right of way impeded.

>

> The reality is that for any complaint, pretty much

> all shared space users observe an appropriate

> caution they would not otherwise. If they didn't,

> shared spaces would never work anywhere. All the

> evidence however shows they quite clearly do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

During the actual lockdown of April, May and June- Rye Lane was completely lawless in regards to cars, businesses and the people who hang around there.


There is a reason why there needs to be a constant traffic warden on that very small stretch of road because people will freely flaunt the rules the second he is gone, as was the case during the worst of the pandemic.


At one point i was on a bus which was trying to get through, among all the cars parked wherever they pleased on the red route kerbs, were several shops that has expanded into the road itself- one with a huge crate of melons blocking the bus's path. Im afraid there is not much more that can improve that street- its utter choas and no one seems to give a damn, perhaps a massive regeneration of the whole area surrounding and including Rye Lane is necessary, to smarten it up a bit and drag it into the 21st century.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been roadworks/temporary lights at Consort Road/Clayton Road, which have been causing delays/tailbacks through the diversion. It wasn?t clear what these were for and no-one working on Wednesday when I went through. Seems very ill-timed when Rye Lane has been closed to traffic, especially buses.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wonderwoman & Clutterqueen, you may both be

> mistaken - in fact you may both be hysterical and

> dismissing cyclists daily experience. Take time to

> reconsider what you actually experienced before

> amending your posts accordingly.

>

>

> Blah Blah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > KK, I am going to say it. You are being

> hysterical

> > and worse than that, dismissing my objective

> > experience as someone who cycles up and down

> Rye

> > Lane most days.

> >

> > The thing about shared spaces is that they are

> > just that. A random meandering of different

> users.

> > It often looks chaotic when actually it is not.

> > Have there been a run of collisions on the far

> > more densely shared stretch at the top of Rye

> Lane

> > over the years? No there haven't. What there

> has

> > been however, are a lot of cyclists and

> > pedestrians alike, complaining about having

> their

> > assumed right of way impeded.

> >

> > The reality is that for any complaint, pretty

> much

> > all shared space users observe an appropriate

> > caution they would not otherwise. If they

> didn't,

> > shared spaces would never work anywhere. All

> the

> > evidence however shows they quite clearly do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm certainly not hysterical and won't amend my post.


Only the other day I was driving down Herne Hill Road towards Loughborough Junction. All the way down I'd followed a Dad and his about a 10 year old son driving on my left side, giving them plenty of room to cycle down to the junction.


The traffic lights turned red. I stopped. The Dad just ushered himself and son around my car and waved his son on to follow him through the red light and beyond. The son looked pretty wobbly on his bike as the Dad was shouting out commands. I was gobsmacked as the Loughborough Junction has a lot of road works going on at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ahh!! Poor snail, isn't nature cruel!
    • But you have to assess whether these persistent drivers are creating more safety issues than diverting emergency vehicles on a longer route and clearly they are not. The fact members of the pro-closure lobby have built their argument on this actually shows how desperate, some would say selfish, they are to have the junction closed and just the way they want it. And unfortunately they seem to have the council over a barrel on something as the council weakly concedes to their position without hesitation. Was this not borne from an FOI that said one of the emergency services confirmed that they had not been consulted on the new DV design that Cllr Leeming then said was actually a mistake by the emergency services - and then it's a case of whether you believe Cllr Leeming or not....and his track record is hardly unblemished when it comes to all things LTNs? Exactly! When the "small vocal minority" was given a mouthpiece that proved it was anything other than small then some have repeatedly tried to discredit the mouthpiece.  The far-left has never been very good at accountability and One Dulwich is forcing our local councillors and council to be accountable to constituents and it wouldn't surprise me if the council are behind a lot of the depositioning activities as One Dulwich is stopping them from getting CPZs rolled out and must be seen as a huge thorn in the side of the idealogical plan they have. Southwark Labour has a long track record of trying to stifle constituents with a view that differs from theirs (see Cllr Leo Pollack for one example) or depositioning anyone trying to represent them (see Cllr Williams during the infamous Cllr Rose "mansplaining" episode. But you know, some think it's One Dulwich that are the greatest threat to local democracy and should not be trusted! 😉
    • A song thrush visited my back garden today. I watched as it smashed open a snail by whacking it against the patio.
    • I have no doubt that local people are genuinely involved (and personally can understand their not wanting to publicise their involvement). That said the proliferation of One groups across London and the degree of co-ordination suggests it is more than just a local grassroots group. I’m not really that interested, except that many of their supporters do bang on about transparency and accountability. I would be interested in the substance of their latest missive. Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Who genuinely believes that people are partially covering their plates and driving through due to inadequate signage? Sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. It feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes tbh.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...