Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Some critics argue that WW2 and not Keynsian theory saved the US economy. Certainly despite the mythology of the Great Depression the UK pulled out far quicker than the US with a more traditionally fiscal route. Keynes also had some views on the maximum amount of budget defeceits which we've gone far beyond. I think you'll find it's more Balls ( an ex of Flanders btw) and Osbourne. That the BBC economists has wet dream about Keynes is hardly a shocker..and good old Will Hutton gets a platform natch.

Ok labour v conservative. Who calls the shots at the end of the day.


The new deal was obviously a democratic mantra and very relevant to what Labour are trying to promote today. Gawd help us if they get I'm.


Love the theory of economics despite only having studied it at a junior level.


And yes Stephanie has made at least two mistakes in her personal life. Both red.

I think trying to seperate Lab vs Cons is a bit of a diversion really - this isnt the 1970s, where we had a genuine difference of opinion/ track between the two parties, the current situation involves two parties who are fighting for the middle ground - what we have in the UK is more like the US scenario.


Also, I woulod suggest that WW2 was more pivotal in sorting out the depression than just a view held by a few critics. Herr Hitler had his own version of a new deal going on alongside FDR and it did jolt a collapsed germany into an industrial superpower in a truly astoundingly few number of years.Whether this was a keynisian inspired is a question for historians though innit

It was already an industrial superpower, just a very troubled one.

Plus you never really got a chance to see how those economic policies panned out in the long term seeing as all those other policies of his made the third reich something of a one trick economy with a rapidly reducing workforce increasingly dependent on rather inefficient slave labour.


It doesn't take too much of an imagination to work out that had he been a bit less is more on all that militarism, expansionism and genocide, that public construction works would have run out of stuff to do and some nasty stagnation and inflation would have followed, especially with domestic consumption unable to fill the gap.


His lovely Empire wouldn't have done much to solve things long term either, terribly short sighted policies that chap.

Well, terrible policies in the literal sense of the word too I guess.


This isn't really Godwin is it.


China in a few years is facing similar issues thinking about it, all those lovely dams and railways and roads are practically done and that workforce is getting pricier.

He got the trains to run on time ( etc ), but it is true that development was dependent on expansion and the rescources ( both human and physical ) required. it was a bit of a national Ponzi scheme.


China though is, quote frankly, fucked.How long they can stage manage it until a new cultural revolution is instigated or it collapses is the moot point

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think trying to seperate Lab vs Cons is a bit of

> a diversion really - this isnt the 1970s, where we

> had a genuine difference of opinion/ track between

> the two parties, the current situation involves

> two parties who are fighting for the middle ground


I don't think they are fighting for the middle ground in terms of their solution to the current economic problems, which is the basis of this thread. Their proposals are very different. However recently the coalition is making infrastruture proposals suggesting they are worried about the merits of their prior strategy.

This is now a game of "read the glossary of an economics text book and work out how many can be innuendos". Still, it's more fun than the normal left v right bunfight on here.


Assets - phwoar


Barrier to entry - fustrating


Boom and bust - a description of J'Lo


Crowding out - only on a Friday


Dumping - Mark Oaten's yer man


Expectations - don't worry, it happens to every man

  • 3 weeks later...

just finished the final one of these this week (oh I love the new download function on the BBC iplayer). Absolutely brilliant series and should be compulsory viewing for our economic illiterate population. I've never been that keen on Stephanie's reporting style but she is brilliant in this. Watch it!


Er, yes, confirmed minx too our Steph.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OOOOooooOOOooohhhHHHHHH 👜 👜 👜 
    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...