Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ben and Jerrys Cookie Dough ice cream ingredients:


Ingredients: Cream (27%), water, condensed skimmed milk, sugar*, wheat flour, brown sugar*, free range egg yolk, milk fat, soybean oil, egg, vegetable fat, cocoa mass*, fat reduced cocoa powder*, vanilla extract*,molasses, stabilisers (guar gum, carrageenan), salt, natural butter flavouring, cocoa butter*, natural vanilla flavouring, natural brown sugar flavour with other natural flavourings, emulsifier (soya lecithin), coffee extract*.


Muck.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ben and Jerrys Cookie Dough ice cream

> ingredients:

>

> Ingredients: Cream (27%), water, condensed skimmed

> milk, sugar*, wheat flour, brown sugar*, free

> range egg yolk, milk fat, soybean oil, egg,

> vegetable fat, cocoa mass*, fat reduced cocoa

> powder*, vanilla extract*,molasses, stabilisers

> (guar gum, carrageenan), salt, natural butter

> flavouring, cocoa butter*, natural vanilla

> flavouring, natural brown sugar flavour with other

> natural flavourings, emulsifier (soya lecithin),

> coffee extract*.

>

> Muck.



If it's muck, it's damned good muck.

Unusually, I'm with Huguenot on this one. There's nothing whatsoever in there that classifies it as muck.


Milk, cream, eggs, sugar = the custard ice cream is made from.


The cocoa and fats would make up the cookie dough.


Is it the emulsifier and stabilisers you have a problem with? Well sheesh, I'd hate to see the response on here if someone were to buy an ice cream from a name manufacturer and it split.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Which ingredient is muck BNG?

> You've got your standard ice cream, plus the

> flavours for cookies and vanilla.


Soybean oil? Vegetable fat?


> What's your problem? And, God bless, what are you

> getting so angry about?


There's no problem. I thought I answered your condescending comment in a straightforward way, but hey ho.


> Bizarre.


Right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I understand that she also has numerous motoring offenses,  Oh wait a second that was someone else https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y4558r5gko] Sadly a cross bencher so can't blame Starmer for this.   Here's a former Tory minister https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65696003
    • Not so fast @malumbu. This is not a nothing to see here moment (and for some of us on the forum it is local as her house is in Dulwich)- the BBC explain why, have a read: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgkvd3jg2no Southwark's role in this will be key - did they alert her, will they fine her (as they have done with other private landlords), was it someone in Southwark who leaked it? This government came in on a ticket of integrity and this type of thing is very damaging to that message - especially in light of other similar issues Starmer's front-bench has had - it cannot be one rule for them and one rule for us. @Dulwichway you know you're in political trouble when videos like that appear within hours of a story breaking.....and goes viral. 
    • The limit is supposed to be 25 per day.  Have you made that amount today? 
    • 🤣 Well, I can apparently  "react" provided I take up a whole other post to do it. I wonder when "today" ends, and what is my daily quota of "reactions"?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...