Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ben and Jerrys Cookie Dough ice cream ingredients:


Ingredients: Cream (27%), water, condensed skimmed milk, sugar*, wheat flour, brown sugar*, free range egg yolk, milk fat, soybean oil, egg, vegetable fat, cocoa mass*, fat reduced cocoa powder*, vanilla extract*,molasses, stabilisers (guar gum, carrageenan), salt, natural butter flavouring, cocoa butter*, natural vanilla flavouring, natural brown sugar flavour with other natural flavourings, emulsifier (soya lecithin), coffee extract*.


Muck.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ben and Jerrys Cookie Dough ice cream

> ingredients:

>

> Ingredients: Cream (27%), water, condensed skimmed

> milk, sugar*, wheat flour, brown sugar*, free

> range egg yolk, milk fat, soybean oil, egg,

> vegetable fat, cocoa mass*, fat reduced cocoa

> powder*, vanilla extract*,molasses, stabilisers

> (guar gum, carrageenan), salt, natural butter

> flavouring, cocoa butter*, natural vanilla

> flavouring, natural brown sugar flavour with other

> natural flavourings, emulsifier (soya lecithin),

> coffee extract*.

>

> Muck.



If it's muck, it's damned good muck.

Unusually, I'm with Huguenot on this one. There's nothing whatsoever in there that classifies it as muck.


Milk, cream, eggs, sugar = the custard ice cream is made from.


The cocoa and fats would make up the cookie dough.


Is it the emulsifier and stabilisers you have a problem with? Well sheesh, I'd hate to see the response on here if someone were to buy an ice cream from a name manufacturer and it split.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Which ingredient is muck BNG?

> You've got your standard ice cream, plus the

> flavours for cookies and vanilla.


Soybean oil? Vegetable fat?


> What's your problem? And, God bless, what are you

> getting so angry about?


There's no problem. I thought I answered your condescending comment in a straightforward way, but hey ho.


> Bizarre.


Right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do they require a direct debit?
    • There seems to be a change in the reception staff - did not recognise a couple of them when I last visited.  Not sure whether one of the long term staff has retired as not seen her for a while.  Used on line facility as my podiatrist recommended antibiotics for a toe infection and also took photo of my toe which I attached yo my request. Got a message back within a day to say medication ordered from chemist. 
    • Alternatively, here's the whole caboodle. Reference    25/AP/1351 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new ATM with associated security camera and light. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference    25/AP/1352 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new louvre. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference   25/AP/1353 Display of 1 no. new non-illuminated box fascia with vinyl lettering, 1 no. new box fascia with internally illuminated acrylic lettering, 2 no. new non-illuminated box fascia, 2 no. new internally illuminated projecting signs and 1 no. new vinyl to be applied around ATM. 29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Advertisement Consent-GRANTED  Decided Mon 07 Jul 2025 The only Lordship Lane item I could find as granted in w/b 13 October was to do with replacement of Dulwich Library's heating system by an air heat pump. 
    • Oh give it a break.  We have an MP who makes racist comments, yet our media (and what seems like this Forum) that generally hate Labour (and loved Johnson) are just out looking for the dirt. It's a move on, nothing to see here.  Particularly if she used a letting agency.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...