Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Before bollards I'd prefer the council to invest in improved road surfaces and renew the paving on LL and elsewhere. Marmora Road is a patchwork of uneven tarmac fill ins and potholes - while the pavements are a nightmare to anyone pushing a buggy or a wheelchair, lumps bumps, potholes and worse. Broadly that situation pertains across all of East Dulwich.
  • 1 year later...

RosieH Wrote,

I don't know, but they definitely need to stay where they are. Even my rather prudish mother laughed at the fabulous bollards and their location on Bellend-en Road (are mums allowed to say stuff like that? freaked me right out)


Haha Rosie,

Not sure if it's still there but the street sign at the Pecham end of Bellenden road had the EN painted out and when you get to the other end you stumble upon the rather phalic looking posts.

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I quite like the Bellenden Village metal bollards

> and think they would suit Lordship Lane very

> well.

>

> As Bellenden Village has now had its ten years of

> public subsidy perhaps we could now ask Southwark

> Council to move the bollards from SE15 to SE22.


(!) I think the London Eye is a fabulous attraction and don't see why the South Bank should get all the attention - if this could be moved to Goose Green I think the area would really benefit.


I don't really agree with pillaging neighbouring boroughs in order to make LL 'look nicer'.

and maybe you could stick that idea where the sun rarely shines, How about we move onto to nunhead for a bit of regeneration. As for public subsidy LL and ED and had more than enough, 5mill upgrade to the sports centre just the latest. No doubt you will get your bollards as the lib executive take the taxes from se15 and pour them back into SE22 just to keep their seats.......the joy of a democracy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...