Jump to content

When I was 14 years old...

MrBen

By MrBen
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Voyageur

Voyageur

Posted
Posted

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's like the final scene from The Big Boss (Bruce

> Lee)

>

> One of the characters leaps up again after being

> mauled and wah-chikk-wooaa'd about a zillion

> times, and kicks off again.

>

> Love it.


Hmmm......indeed. 'I have NOTHING more to say on the subject but I INSIST on having the last word'.

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

"He has such a hard-on for his women's-issues-are-bullshit agenda that he considers even twelve year old girls fair game"


"I just wanted to make it TRIPLY clear I wasn't calling H a paedophile"


RosieH, You have lost it haven't you? Who else thinks 12 year old girls are fair game for hard-ons but paedophiles?


Read that, and read it AGAIN. What is wrong with you?


You are behaving in an extraordinary way, and tossing around insults and abuse with reckless disregard for either truth or for the basic rights of other people not to be abused by you. You need to stop this now.


All I did was make perfectly reasonable observations that celebrated existing social commentary, but it seems you have elevated this into a make believe world where I have become a vehicle for every hang up and diseased conviction you have against the male gender.


Stop it.


You need to understand that just because there are 10 opinions out there, and I offer an additional perspective it is not saying that I disagree with everything or anything that has already been said.


Clearly in your fucked up world view it does.


I can understand that Jah in his polarised tabloid world view thinks that there is only one approach to any problem and only one perspective. He's been coached in it for years, and relativistic approaches like mine drive him nuts.


That doesn't make me a troll, or the object for your issues and anxieties. Leave me alone, and be grown up enough even if just for a minute to recognise that your behaviour and smears are shocking.

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

It's clear she intended a sexual analogy in order to sustain the insult, Ted. She's not stupid.


She is quite off her head though. She's fabricated an entire women hating personality for me and is pursuing this attack based solely on what's in her imagination.

Ted Max

Ted Max

Posted
Posted

You brought up that 12 year old girls have an inflated notion of their own maturity, compared to boys, as a result of mestruation. Fine.


She said that by doing that you were considering 12 year olds "fair game" in furthering your anti-women's issues agenda. Fair game as in, "He's so keen to debunk women's issues as valid that he will hook into his argument anything that looks to help his cause, even the sexual development of 12 year olds".


There's no other suggestion there other than what you have chosen to load upon it to sustain this, "She called me a peedo" stance.


I have no dog in this fight, I'm just trying to help you here as you seem to be struggling a bit.

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

It's 6pm here SteveO.


I don't have an anti-women's issues agenda TM. RosieH has a very clear narrative within which women are victims of men, and her conviction is that anyone who challenges that narrative with either observations or opinions that run counter to it must by definition be a woman hater.


Her assault is based on crimes which I have not committed.


It's an insult to everyone's intelligence to suggest that she isn't trying to sustain a clear connection between me and deviant behaviour by consistently using sexual metaphors and references to children.


Not only is that an almost criminal smear, but couching it as an apology whilst repeating the insult is despicable.


You know that too TM, so please, save your disingenuous critique of her prose for someone else.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Damart catalogue promised much, but there was

> ALWAYS at least one torso of a middle-aged man -

> wearing giant thermolactyl underpants -

> strategically placed on every page.


The Damart catalogue is still going strong, and the aforementioned thermolactyl underpants now have a worringly reassuring look about them...

Voyageur

Voyageur

Posted
Posted

Not every 14, or even 12 year old girl is going to have the same epiphany in terms of sexual enlightenment, and not every girl starting er periods going to fancy going out with older boys. A fair few do, however - simple as that.


For what it's worth, I don't find it odd for middle aged people - male or female - discussing puberty on a thread titled 'when I was 14 years old', and I find it kind of odd that people would.

Voyageur

Voyageur

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The Damart catalogue promised much, but there

> was

> > ALWAYS at least one torso of a middle-aged man

> -

> > wearing giant thermolactyl underpants -

> > strategically placed on every page.

>

> The Damart catalogue is still going strong, and

> the aforementioned thermolactyl underpants now

> have a worringly reassuring look about them...


There is a gentleman's outfitters in a market town that I often visit that has a waist to upper thigh mannequin with a HUGE packet exhibiting a succession of Y-Fronts. I am no prude but I have to avert my eyes each time I pass!

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I can understand that Jah in his polarised tabloid

> world view thinks that there is only one approach

> to any problem and only one perspective. He's been

> coached in it for years, and relativistic

> approaches like mine drive him nuts.



What on earth makes you think that I've no idea. Have it your way. Draw your own conclusion (as usual) I'm sure you know best.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------

> I can understand that Jah in his polarised tabloid

> world view thinks that there is only one approach

> to any problem and only one perspective. He's been

> coached in it for years, and relativistic

> approaches like mine drive him nuts.

You really are up yourself aren't you? Jah is not the only EDFer that dislikes you and your views and its no wonder with what you've written above. You write in such a self righteous and condescending manner its hard to find any redeeming features for you. I agree with Jahs' view of you. You insult others and dress it up as an educated, erudite opinion, and cry wolf when you get a verbal kicking. Why would anyone want pick on poor old, innocent, inoffensive, intellectual you? Bless.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe they fancy each other.

>

> Salsaboy, can you tell Rosie that Hugenot fancies

> her? He'll meet her behind the bins at hometime.


Ah that's where you're wrong, we both fancy you, you big hunk of a man you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...