Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*puts sensible hat on*


please don't call the police just because you've seen the girls, call the Safer Neighbourhood Team instead here's their details


East Dulwich Ward Safer Neighbourhood Team

Tel: 020 8721 2447


*takes sensible hat off*


or slice 'em into little pieces and make them into big earrings and a hat and wear them with pride

Mark...


What will the Safer Neighbourhood Team Do? You can't just leave a report of a sighting of known trouble makers, they need to be delt with at the time. Even if they are doing nothing; seemingly, the police have every right to stop them and ask them what they ARE doing out at night hanging around the streets. Especially as they are believed to have been involved in quite a few unpleasant incidences.

Safer Neighbourhood police teams - taken from http://www.southwark.gov.uk/YourCommunity/Dulwich/lookingafterDulwich.html


"There are three Safer Neighbourhoods police teams in Dulwich in addition to other policing teams. Each team is made up of six police and Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs). Their aim is to find out what affects your daily life and feelings of security and help find lasting solutions to these problems.


Teams are permanent ... See this site http://www.met.police.uk/saferneighbourhoods/ for more details"


I think the clue is in the name, they help to make the neighbourhood safer. You don't feel safe, call them and tell them about it. There was a need for people to feel safer in their neighbourhood so they set whole department to help people feel safer, I'm just saying use them as that's their sole purpose.


The police have other things to do, image if you were being attacked by these girls and called the police but they were delayed because someone on the other side of the 'hood had reported seeing a trouble maker outside a shop.

Had an aggravated burglary last Saturday in one of my houses. Bloke with a knife gained entry by deception and then attacked 2 tenants. Police called and their response was........ we do not have enough resources to come out.


So call the police if you like but don't expect a response this side of next month! :(

MW74,


Just to reiterate what Mark said: calling 999 is less likely to get a response just to a siting and will certainly be 'prioritised' out of existence pretty quickly. Ringing the SNT however will actually have the opposite effect as this sort of activity is their main priority - building up intelligence and being bodies on the ground dealing with anti-social activities as well as actual crime. There are always patrols out during a shift so the nearest should respond pretty quickly.


I mentioned on another thread that the SNT is really keen at the moment to up its profile and explain more fully its role and priorities - we (I am a member of the Ward Panel that meets regularly to set priorities for SNT in ED) are working on that at the moment and there should be a lot more info / contact details on here soon.


It also worth noting that SNT were set up to interact very closely with the community and actually have their priorities set by them. If these people are known to hang out in a certain area and cause issues there regularly, then the SNT will alter their shift patterns etc to confront them.


Only point to note though is that I think FHT actually falls in Peckham Rye SNT rather than ED but the info to follow should clear that up.


Dave

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...