Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The problem with all 'recent' period dramas is that the costume/art department are run by 20 somethings so they (understandably)go for the cliche's of a decade. So they think 80s=yuppies...actually that was post big-bang (1986) in 1981 the whole country was skintand even posh bits of London were packed with squats. Same with the 70s - punks on '70s dramas' always have mohicanns which was a far later (around 1980) anarchopunk style and not a street fashion of 1976/77 at all
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2644-ashes-to-ashes/#findComment-80304
Share on other sites

Planning to persevere - enjoyed episode 2 more than 1. Agree historical nuances are mostly inaccurate - tho' the whole Charles & Di thing was pretty spot on. I remember running away and hiding in a tent on the Pennine Way to avoid the hysteria. I remember London as being pretty shabby, life being being somewhat unrewarding with money tight and fun elusive.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2644-ashes-to-ashes/#findComment-80309
Share on other sites

...was Life on Mars really like life was in the 70's or was it like the cop show's known and loved in the 70's?


Only saw the first ep of this, but my thought was that it was a pastiche on the way 80's cop shows seemed (how A team was the whole boat chase/shooting at baddies but not killing any of them?!) Also the fact its ?all in Alex's head - maybe her memory of the 80's is that crap!!


Course being a late 70's baby both these go over my head a little so maybe I've got it completely wrong!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2644-ashes-to-ashes/#findComment-80327
Share on other sites

I loved LoM but have been dubious about the sequel - I haven't seen any of it yet but have taped it ("taped it"???)


But my suspicions appear to be borne out my experiences so far - I got the impression after series1 of LoM that they didn't quite know what to do next and series 2 had great moments but seemed to have lost the focus on the central premise and enjoyed the soapiness of the characters more. The climaz of series2 was almost wonderful until the bit AFTER the building-top

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2644-ashes-to-ashes/#findComment-80331
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I loved LoM but have been dubious about the sequel

> - I haven't seen any of it yet but have taped it

> ("taped it"???)

>

> But my suspicions appear to be borne out my

> experiences so far - I got the impression after

> series1 of LoM that they didn't quite know what to

> do next and series 2 had great moments but seemed

> to have lost the focus on the central premise and

> enjoyed the soapiness of the characters more. The

> climaz of series2 was almost wonderful until the

> bit AFTER the building-top




taped it thats soooooooo 80s,did you use vhs or betamax.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2644-ashes-to-ashes/#findComment-80358
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Right then, there was more talk about this on another thread, but it all went quiet a while ago. Who stuck with it, and what did you think?


I wasn't at all sure about it for the first couple, but have grown to love it! The rapport between Gene & Alex is superb, and the man/woman relationship is a welcome releif from the man to man macho oneupmanship that existed with Gene & Sam in Life on Mars.


I loved LOM, but actually I think I've had more enjoyment out of this series.


Last one tonight, and it's the day of her parents death, but I'll be surprised if this is the last one, I think they'll do 2 series as with LOM... (if you remember, series 1 of LOM ended with a big life event for Sam, he found out his father was bad news after all).


Do you think next will be a 90s black, gay policeman going back for some time with Gene??? >:D<

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2644-ashes-to-ashes/#findComment-90083
Share on other sites

Nope - I thought it got worse and worse and last week was one of the most excruciating programmes I've seen for ages. I kmow it's Easter but all this resurrecting characters to fit the plot (Shaz here and Owen in Torchwood) is just lazy scriptwriting. I will watch the last episode tonight because I've got this far but don't think I'd bother to watch another series.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2644-ashes-to-ashes/#findComment-90098
Share on other sites

I actually thought the resurrection of Shaz fitted the plot fine - as it's all Alex's subconscious (and we know that it is) there was no reason why she couldn't choose to have Shaz wake up. Doubtless some psychiatrists from the Institute (sure there must be some on here) will tell me exactly why the fact that it is her subconscious is the very reason she couldn't choose it, but hey


I agree with Keef - have laughed out loud and lusted after Gene so much more in this series than LOM. There's no doubting that as a drama, the quality has diminished, but the enjoyment factor's HUGE. Everything's lighter, the music's brilliant and how slutty is Alex's policewoman dress sense? Gene can fire up my quatro every day of the week

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2644-ashes-to-ashes/#findComment-90117
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
    • Like everyone, super impressed with Leon. Came when he said he would. Gave great advice. Job done really quickly and efficiently. Perfect. Highly recommend 
    • Last December I made a post which said "Peter Mandelson has all the skills and abilities to make an exceedingly good diplomat" and up until yesterday he had undoubtedly demonstrated his abilities. I fear now that the story about relations with Epstein will run and run and the outcome may not be beneficial for either Peter or even Trump.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...