Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just heard another round of fireworks going off, first lot started 10.15 then another lot 10.20 now a third bout.


Very loud coming from the Dog Kennel Hill area. Why can't people keep it early on a weekday?


I'm a night person anyway so still up reading papers, doing paperwork, on EDF but it must be so annoying for families with young children.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26747-more-fireworks/
Share on other sites

The Fireworks Regulations 2004 don't generally permit use of fireworks during night hours, except on permitted fireworks nights, defined as below:


7(3) In this regulation, ?night hours? means the period beginning at 11 pm and ending at 7 am the following day and a ?permitted fireworks night? means a period?

(a)beginning at 11 pm on the first day of the Chinese New Year and ending at 1 am the following day;

(b)beginning at 11 pm on 5th November and ending at 12 am the following day;

©beginning at 11 pm on the day of Diwali and ending at 1 am the following day; or

(d)beginning at 11 pm on 31st December and ending at 1 am the following day.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > relax people- it's a couple of times a year

> > maximum

>

> I'm not that bothered but it is several days not a

> couple! Unless you are hard of hearing.


xxxxxxxx


I thought you were rather keen on fireworks, e-dealer? You banged on about their cancellation enough :))

garnwba Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> last night was actually the Indian new year which

> follows Diwali - bit like the ?500,000 worth of

> firewors the major sets off each year at our New

> year post 10.30pm....... or is that different

> minder / ratty?



No, it's not different, I hate having my kids woken up then too and being up all night with them. However, they are rarely on my fooking doorstep like they were last night.


Are you trying to subtley accuse me of being pissed off about these fireworks because they may have been in celebration of Diwali instead of new year? pray tell, cos I thnk you are!

garnwba Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> last night was actually the Indian new year which

> follows Diwali - bit like the ?500,000 worth of

> firewors the major sets off each year at our New

> year post 10.30pm....... or is that different

> minder / ratty?


who is this trigger-happy major setting off firewors on New year?

But garnwba the fireworks the mayor has in London are not really in a residential area.


My point is that couldn't the fireworks have been set off earlier, especially on a weekday.


Asking me if it's different because it's Diwali doesn't come into it, as I know what Diwali is and when it is.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But garnwba the fireworks the mayor has in London

> are not really in a residential area.

>

> My point is that couldn't the fireworks have been

> set off earlier, especially on a weekday.

>

> Asking me if it's different because it's Diwali

> doesn't come into it, as I know what Diwali is and

> when it is.



No answer from Garnwba

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What a ridiculous plan. If this is to stop traffic "cutting through" where do they think it is now going to "cut through" via? Has the council produced any data on the scale of the problem on Ryedale - anything to back up their hypothesis? You cannot do these things in isolation as all it does is displaces traffic elsewhere. Dunstans is going to become awful - I feel for the residents there. Councils should not be allowed to implement these experimental TMOs, they are clearly using them to circumvent proper planning and engagement. Has anyone contacted the local councillors about this? The laughable thing was the local ward councillors were concerned about displacement from the wider Dulwich LTNs on their ward so is this an indirect acknowledgement that they are being impacted?  Ridiculous.  
    • I would never leave my dog tied up outside a shop nowadays. A large proportion of ‘dogs stolen’ notices feature dogs nicked from outside shops- fancy dogs, old dogs, mongrels , all sorts. Stolen on a whim, for mischief, for profit or as a bait dog to train fighters. A thief might abandon them shortly afterwards, but the heartbreak and confusion is already done and a reunion not guaranteed.
    • It's a terrible idea, will damage trade in Forest Hill Road and is just creating a nice private road for someone to enjoy. Congestion in the road is caused mainly by delivery vans, well, let's help stamp out those scourges. And an 18 month trial is at least a year too long if you are just interested in judging impact. And there has been no consultation at all, save, perhaps, with the privileged Rydale-ers. I live a block away in Underhill and I've heard only via social media. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...