Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just heard another round of fireworks going off, first lot started 10.15 then another lot 10.20 now a third bout.


Very loud coming from the Dog Kennel Hill area. Why can't people keep it early on a weekday?


I'm a night person anyway so still up reading papers, doing paperwork, on EDF but it must be so annoying for families with young children.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26747-more-fireworks/
Share on other sites

The Fireworks Regulations 2004 don't generally permit use of fireworks during night hours, except on permitted fireworks nights, defined as below:


7(3) In this regulation, ?night hours? means the period beginning at 11 pm and ending at 7 am the following day and a ?permitted fireworks night? means a period?

(a)beginning at 11 pm on the first day of the Chinese New Year and ending at 1 am the following day;

(b)beginning at 11 pm on 5th November and ending at 12 am the following day;

©beginning at 11 pm on the day of Diwali and ending at 1 am the following day; or

(d)beginning at 11 pm on 31st December and ending at 1 am the following day.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > relax people- it's a couple of times a year

> > maximum

>

> I'm not that bothered but it is several days not a

> couple! Unless you are hard of hearing.


xxxxxxxx


I thought you were rather keen on fireworks, e-dealer? You banged on about their cancellation enough :))

garnwba Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> last night was actually the Indian new year which

> follows Diwali - bit like the ?500,000 worth of

> firewors the major sets off each year at our New

> year post 10.30pm....... or is that different

> minder / ratty?



No, it's not different, I hate having my kids woken up then too and being up all night with them. However, they are rarely on my fooking doorstep like they were last night.


Are you trying to subtley accuse me of being pissed off about these fireworks because they may have been in celebration of Diwali instead of new year? pray tell, cos I thnk you are!

garnwba Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> last night was actually the Indian new year which

> follows Diwali - bit like the ?500,000 worth of

> firewors the major sets off each year at our New

> year post 10.30pm....... or is that different

> minder / ratty?


who is this trigger-happy major setting off firewors on New year?

But garnwba the fireworks the mayor has in London are not really in a residential area.


My point is that couldn't the fireworks have been set off earlier, especially on a weekday.


Asking me if it's different because it's Diwali doesn't come into it, as I know what Diwali is and when it is.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But garnwba the fireworks the mayor has in London

> are not really in a residential area.

>

> My point is that couldn't the fireworks have been

> set off earlier, especially on a weekday.

>

> Asking me if it's different because it's Diwali

> doesn't come into it, as I know what Diwali is and

> when it is.



No answer from Garnwba

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
    • Amazing work from Leon, doing out electrical survey and replacing our consumer board. Great communications, tidy work, reliable friendly and reasonably priced. A pleasure to have around and highly recommended. 
    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...