Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just heard another round of fireworks going off, first lot started 10.15 then another lot 10.20 now a third bout.


Very loud coming from the Dog Kennel Hill area. Why can't people keep it early on a weekday?


I'm a night person anyway so still up reading papers, doing paperwork, on EDF but it must be so annoying for families with young children.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/26747-more-fireworks/
Share on other sites

The Fireworks Regulations 2004 don't generally permit use of fireworks during night hours, except on permitted fireworks nights, defined as below:


7(3) In this regulation, ?night hours? means the period beginning at 11 pm and ending at 7 am the following day and a ?permitted fireworks night? means a period?

(a)beginning at 11 pm on the first day of the Chinese New Year and ending at 1 am the following day;

(b)beginning at 11 pm on 5th November and ending at 12 am the following day;

©beginning at 11 pm on the day of Diwali and ending at 1 am the following day; or

(d)beginning at 11 pm on 31st December and ending at 1 am the following day.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > relax people- it's a couple of times a year

> > maximum

>

> I'm not that bothered but it is several days not a

> couple! Unless you are hard of hearing.


xxxxxxxx


I thought you were rather keen on fireworks, e-dealer? You banged on about their cancellation enough :))

garnwba Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> last night was actually the Indian new year which

> follows Diwali - bit like the ?500,000 worth of

> firewors the major sets off each year at our New

> year post 10.30pm....... or is that different

> minder / ratty?



No, it's not different, I hate having my kids woken up then too and being up all night with them. However, they are rarely on my fooking doorstep like they were last night.


Are you trying to subtley accuse me of being pissed off about these fireworks because they may have been in celebration of Diwali instead of new year? pray tell, cos I thnk you are!

garnwba Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> last night was actually the Indian new year which

> follows Diwali - bit like the ?500,000 worth of

> firewors the major sets off each year at our New

> year post 10.30pm....... or is that different

> minder / ratty?


who is this trigger-happy major setting off firewors on New year?

But garnwba the fireworks the mayor has in London are not really in a residential area.


My point is that couldn't the fireworks have been set off earlier, especially on a weekday.


Asking me if it's different because it's Diwali doesn't come into it, as I know what Diwali is and when it is.

minder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But garnwba the fireworks the mayor has in London

> are not really in a residential area.

>

> My point is that couldn't the fireworks have been

> set off earlier, especially on a weekday.

>

> Asking me if it's different because it's Diwali

> doesn't come into it, as I know what Diwali is and

> when it is.



No answer from Garnwba

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...