Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You know you don't have to go to a supermarket for a weekly shop, right?


And even if you do, how does 20mph impact on the trip anyway


Sorry djkillaqueen but you seem a bit ott argumentative for no great reason on this one


Strip away all the city v city, age of posters, money etc etc arguments and we are no worse off.

If I'm working say 70 hours a week (as many people do), I think I prefer to do all my shop in one go, or if I have a family to look after, I may prefer to do the bulk of my shop in one go. In my own case, I have cats. Have you tried getting 10kg of litter on a bicycle SJ? And sainsburrys is the only place I buy it because it's only ?1.28 a bag....as opposed to ?3-4 a bag anywhere closer.


I've stated my reasons for opposing a blanket 20mphr limit earlier in the thread. The latter part of the thread has moved on to ignoring cars altogether and promoting the bicycle as an alternative. I'm just engaging in a debate and trying to introduce balance - being someone who cycles and drives and uses public transport and being able to see the need for all of them.


Disagreement doesn't always equate to being argumentative SJ ;)

DJKillaQueen, it's unfortunate you jump to conclusions as to what I think about other forms of transport.


I walk, cycle, take the bus, tube, drive. By designing properly and specifically for purpose, everyone can benefit from the improvements, especially drivers.


It seems you have a real problem hearing someone younger than yourself propose new ideas. Remember, ideas come from all levels, not just top transport execs. You're welcome to your opinion, but it's slightly boring to hear such a constant flow of negativity.

70 hours a week As many people do? Maybe so. Shall we define many?


As many as are on the roads for the shop? I doubt it


If you have time to drive to and schlep around a supermarket why not book a time slot to have it delivered?

Well I'm not reading all that but I think that a 20mph across the Borough is fine. For starters, most people use public transport and with all those bus stops, traffic lights, etc, you'll rarely get above 20mph anyway.


In reality, it's not the speed limit that needs adjusting, but people's attitudes. City life means getting everywhere 3mins before you left. Just take it easy or leave earlier!

Coops we'll just have to agree to disagree. I certainly don't have a problem with the view of any one of any age (I was young once too and still work with young people)...just views based on models in cities the person proposing them has never lived in. I think I've been eloquent in my counter arguments to those points, and would never be bored by anyone engaging in a debate that interests me, personally.


SJ, of course not every one using the car for a particular journey needs to, and to be fair I didn't say that. 'Some' people though do have to use cars and we are not being fair to them in this drive to drive (excuse the pun) people out of cars. Quite often I've walked to Sainsburrys and got the bus back (because one stops outside my home) which is cheaper than a home delivery. The one time I did take a home delivery for bulk cat stuff, they didn't deliver most of it as they didn't have the stock in...so I wasn't too impressed by that option (a one off I hope though).


"In reality, it's not the speed limit that needs adjusting, but people's attitudes. City life means getting everywhere 3mins before you left. Just take it easy or leave earlier!"


Albert, that's one of the most sensible things written on this thread so far :)

"Studying something is not the same as seeing the real impact for yourself"


Agreed. One draws on a very large data set, the other a very small one, and one viewed through an entirely subjective lens. Not perhaps the best argument for saying 'listen to me'.

  • 4 weeks later...
Its perfectly reasonable for someone who isn't a practitioner to draw on an evidence base of what actually works. New things will have a smaller evidence base. In any case these aren't new ideas but examples have taken a long time to get to fruition. You can kill the messenger for studying or for using stats, but I think the real issue is what are our shared objectives? The collective vs the individual. If we do want lower noise, kids playing on streets (even being able to cycle to school) then something from status quo has to give around current car use, if its not 20mph then it'll be something else.
Now that the insurance premiums on young male and female drivers has been equilibrated does that mean we will have more boy racers on the roads?- unfortunately I think it does because their premiums were the only barrier to driving. The whole EU ruling makes acomplete mockery of actuarial science, and may be a catalyst to the wholesale adoption of 20mph limits in urban areas -thereby increasing pollution; and it will not stop the boy racer (or girl racer for that matter)

Yes, most of Southwark is 20mph limit, still doesn't stop most speeding - example Southampton Way with a school - It's all a 20mph zone and no-one follows it. You create 20mph zones through design. Wide, open streets encourage speed.


As I said before, it's about permeability. It's a well-used technique, and means neighbourhoods are totally free for access, but not through routes for cars to use as rat-runs.


This means quieter streets in residential areas, less conflict-opportunities between pedestrians/cyclists and motor vehicles yada yada yada.

It could also be argued that a blanket low speed limit would encourage frustrated drivers to speed. At present, a driver can choose to stick to (hump free) main roads or not.The principle of a 20mpr borough wide zone is an excessive over reaction.

Being frustrated is not an excuse. Southwark is following other councils doing the same, and the ideal scenario would be if all inner-London boroughs followed and z1-3 was a blanket 20mph.


No confusion about speed limits, less frustration and less scary roads.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.            
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
    • The Pie House Co-op Deptford Emergency Crisis - Needs YOUR Help. This not-for-profit, worker-run, wheelchair accessible music and arts venue at 213-214 Edward Place SE8 5HD THE CRISIS: From Liv, Grace & Sonia, On Friday 31st October, there was a flash flood in Deptford, and we found ourselves with water pouring in through the lighting fixtures, damaging our electrics and sound system. We have been forced to close for one of the busiest weekends of the year, losing thousands of pounds in income, and are now having to fight our landlords for support with the leak. We are asking all our allies for support as we try and reignite the crowdfunder to reflect the new expensive work that needs to take place, and the gear we need to replace. Thank you in advance for your support so far, and your support going forward. If you have any ideas with getting media attention, or fundraising - please get in touch on [email protected] Even if you like myself have not previously visited this venue, supporting small not for profit venues are vital to the life blood of what 'commmunity' is all about. HOW YOU CAN HELP: 1) If you are an electrician and can offer to help for free or at cost, please email: [email protected] Your help would of course be acknowledged. 2) If you are a Sound Engineer and can offer to help for free or at cost, please email: [email protected] Your help would of course be acknowledged. 3) If you are a journalist or have connections with the local and wider media (Print, on line, TV, Radio, please email: [email protected] 4) 'Every Little Helps' even just £1 will make a difference, please support the crowd funder: https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/.../piehouse-workers-co-op... Via insta @piehouse.coop there is a video (see screenshots here) THANK YOU.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...