Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think they thought given she had to be hospitalized that it would get out anyway and wanted to maintain some control over the news by announcing it themselves. That seemed to be the explanation on the BBC.


Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bit stupid to announce it before she's even 12

> weeks, but then I guess horrible shitty luck

> doesn't happen to them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
    • Apparently a tourist tax was Raynor's idea, but Reeves has put the kibosh on it because of the push-back she'll get from businesses
    • But a larger number, in a more hotly contested election, didn't. It is an anomaly that Starmer won a landslide in seats with a turnout for Labour which would have shamed Labour leaders in all the 21st and much of the post war 20th century.
    • I was not suggesting anything else!   I'm not sure how you interpret what I said  as "irrelevant"? I was responding to a post saying that Corbyn was "unelectable". My point was that a  large number  of the electorate  voted for him!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...