Jump to content

Cafe


tibby

Recommended Posts

Are you planning to leave before or after you develop the Victorian house into luxury flats? Many people would consider such development equally detrimental to ED's 'vibe'. Have you sought Fred R's views, for example?



letmefixthat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That sucks, those chains spoil all areas and east

> Dulwich is so special as it has people who want

> home cooked and home made produce of high quality.

> if Starbucks moves in then i am moving out as that

> will be the start of the end of lordship lane. I

> hate Tesco express with a passion and thery should

> be banned as they destroy communitys and son there

> will be no bloody choice or good food available at

> all as we will all be forced to buy the cheaply

> grown crappy food that all supermarkets sell. Goof

> Folks of east Dulwich stand together and don't let

> these American super chains destroy your lovely

> lordship lane or your choice. OH MY DAYS THAT IS

> RUBBISH AND VERY SAD IF IT HAPPENS!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/28053-cafe/#findComment-608057
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They probably serve lukewarm coffee due to their American-style hyper sensitivity to people sueing them if they scald themselves on a properly hot drink.


I have no idea how much truth there is to the rumour that Starbucks may be eyeing up Lordship Lane.


But I agree with those who say - vote with your purse - make sure you buy from independent shops/businesses if you value their continued presence in the area. And should there be some kind of campaign to keep out larger chains - then back it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/28053-cafe/#findComment-611506
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...