Jump to content

Cafe


tibby

Recommended Posts

Are you planning to leave before or after you develop the Victorian house into luxury flats? Many people would consider such development equally detrimental to ED's 'vibe'. Have you sought Fred R's views, for example?



letmefixthat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That sucks, those chains spoil all areas and east

> Dulwich is so special as it has people who want

> home cooked and home made produce of high quality.

> if Starbucks moves in then i am moving out as that

> will be the start of the end of lordship lane. I

> hate Tesco express with a passion and thery should

> be banned as they destroy communitys and son there

> will be no bloody choice or good food available at

> all as we will all be forced to buy the cheaply

> grown crappy food that all supermarkets sell. Goof

> Folks of east Dulwich stand together and don't let

> these American super chains destroy your lovely

> lordship lane or your choice. OH MY DAYS THAT IS

> RUBBISH AND VERY SAD IF IT HAPPENS!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/28053-cafe/#findComment-608057
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They probably serve lukewarm coffee due to their American-style hyper sensitivity to people sueing them if they scald themselves on a properly hot drink.


I have no idea how much truth there is to the rumour that Starbucks may be eyeing up Lordship Lane.


But I agree with those who say - vote with your purse - make sure you buy from independent shops/businesses if you value their continued presence in the area. And should there be some kind of campaign to keep out larger chains - then back it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/28053-cafe/#findComment-611506
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
    • Amazing work from Leon, doing out electrical survey and replacing our consumer board. Great communications, tidy work, reliable friendly and reasonably priced. A pleasure to have around and highly recommended. 
    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...