Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Travelling to a meeting today I caught the end of a radio discussion about Assisted Dying / Euthenasia. Basic argument was that with people living longer, how do we as a society make the right decisions about quality of life and when it might be right to allow assisted death for those suffering with no hope of recovery?


As someone who is now closer to the end of my life than its beginning (albeit I hope still a fair way off) this is a subject that is beginning to interest me.


I have made a living will ? but it only informs my relatives and carers of my desires, and has no legal force to allow me, or others, to insist upon assistance in dying if I am in a irreversible coma, or intense, insufferable and incurable pain.


Questions:


1. Should assisted dying be allowed ? by assisted dying I mean that an individual elects to die and is then given a painless and planned death to avoid unnecessary pain or suffering.


2. Should euthanasia be allowed ? by euthenasia I mean passing the decision for speeding up the process of dying to others, either relatives, carers, guardians or medical staff, because the individual is in a coma, unable to articulate their wishes, persistent vegetative state.


3. What safeguards would be required if either 1. or 2. were to be allowed?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/
Share on other sites

1. Absolutely!


2. Not so sure, unless of course it is stipulated very clearly in a will. I think entrusting that decision to someone else is asking a hell of a lot of them. There is also the risk of people getting rid of elderly relatives for financial gain.


3. God knows, it'll be a minefild, and will need some very substantial legislation around it!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86189
Share on other sites

I think number two already exists.

When my dear old gran was found to have a terminal tumour, having been barking mad for the est part of a decade, the medical staff, with the consent of her kids, decided not to treat it. She still took an aeon to die; strong as an ox she was.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86199
Share on other sites

Bloody hell MM. As if grappling with the rights and wrongs of Thatcher?s policies, the nature of class, the worldwide powers of the Catholic Church and where next to meet for drinks isn?t hard enough.


A controversal and emotive subject, debate on which I think is going to lead to more grey areas than answers. My mind is a bit too fried with work stress at the moment to jump into the fray though.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86201
Share on other sites

1) I think many people who have seen the indignity and cruelty of long-term terminal illness would agree absolutely yes.


2) I waver, but would probably come down on the side of no... too many near-misses, too much risk of decisions being made for wrong reasons.


3) At the very least, an independent medical assessment of being of sound mind, and a 'cooling-off' period. How to get around the problem of pressure from relatives worried about how to pay for crippling medical bills or indeed the self-administered pressure of 'I don't want to be a burden' I don't know.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86203
Share on other sites

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think number two already exists.

> When my dear old gran was found to have a terminal

> tumour, having been barking mad for the est part

> of a decade, the medical staff, with the consent

> of her kids, decided not to treat it. She still

> took an aeon to die; strong as an ox she was.


'Number two' exists but it goes somewhat further than turning that machine off, or 'deciding not to treat it'.


Ask you local GP, or terminal illness care special ist. Not that they'll admit it, of course.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86205
Share on other sites

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think number two already exists.

> When my dear old gran was found to have a terminal

> tumour, having been barking mad for the est part

> of a decade, the medical staff, with the consent

> of her kids, decided not to treat it. She still

> took an aeon to die; strong as an ox she was.


At present No.2 exists in a form - but the "not to treat" can mean everything from not giving drugs to prolong life to actually withdrawing food & drink - condemning the patient to die of starvation / dehydration, not a good way to go.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86215
Share on other sites

EDDW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> At present No.2 exists in a form - but the "not to

> treat" can mean everything from not giving drugs

> to prolong life to actually withdrawing food &

> drink -


You've missed one. Giving.. let's say.. an excess of drugs

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86229
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> EDDW Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > At present No.2 exists in a form - but the "not

> to

> > treat" can mean everything from not giving

> drugs

> > to prolong life to actually withdrawing food &

> > drink -

>

> You've missed one. Giving.. let's say.. an excess

> of drugs


The Shipman solution

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86233
Share on other sites

An interesting topic...


the distinction currently made is the difference between withdrawal of treatment vs an act of intentional harm. Treatment can be refused at any point in illness, in which case the new treatment to offer is symptom management. CWALD may be the best person to help here, with that LD, but as far as I'm aware a living will can be arranged but only to state the circumstances in which you would want treatment to be withdrawn. In the UK, Medical staff can never take an act to intentionally harm, regardless of consent or desire - it's a legal no-no, and even if that was ever changed, it'd be a big ethical minefield for a lot of us in the trade.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86240
Share on other sites

Not wanting to press the point but..


You may wish to pretend that the medical profession are sworn to this or that and boil 'assisted dying' down to what's allowed and what isn't allowed by law.. to which end I'm sure the legals minds knocking about on't forum will be glad to advise. But, like it or not, there is something of a gulf between what might be a legal no-no, and what actually goes on. And it does go on.


Let's hope that you (or yours) never have to find out.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86242
Share on other sites

This is an interesting debate because the rights of the individual to decide what they want are very seldom taken into consideration.


A living will is the document which comes close to protecting those rights. Its then up to the family and the medical team just how they will carry out the wishes of the individual.....if anyone knows anything different, please comment. I've seen it work very successfully in the states, not sure how it works over here.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86262
Share on other sites

Out of expediency, doctors have to take the "...for what I have done and what I have failed to do..." approach to those that are slipping away. They can act to do something or omit to do it. Either way , as *Bob* says, doctors already take decisions about the deaths of patients.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86263
Share on other sites

If I was in pain and no chance of improvement I would consider a whiff of gas for permanent sleep, or injection of morphine the way to go.


I was told 'never to be afraid of death' because you die every night.


I have never felt that life is that good to hold on to at all costs, if I were in uncontrollable pain give me the termination pill and let me go. I hope and pray for a doctor who is worldly wise enough to recognise that to give me a good send off.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86267
Share on other sites

1 Absolutely

2 Absolutely

3 Safeguards mean that your friends and relatives (in my case in THAT order) would have to be the ones to help me make the decision and give the doctors the say-so to go ahead. I think we should have to put on line on a dedicated website names and addresses (not visible to everyone of course) only visible to those need to see it at the time, of our friends and relatives we want to contact should such a time occur. To be updated yearly. Then the disc with all this info on can be left in someone's car and stolen and used and blah blah

Hey - I have not thought this all through because I am supposed to be working but it seems like a good idea!

I worked for a funeral directors and saw relatives and friends who had had to witness unnecessarily long painful deaths of their loved ones which made everything so much more unbearable.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86337
Share on other sites

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 1. Absolutely not.

>

> 2. Absolutely not.

>

> 3. not needed


This is a very absolut-ist position and differs from the bulk of postings.


iI'd be interested to hear and understand your reasoning .

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86342
Share on other sites

My father died in January after a long and towards the end very painful death. He couldn't do anything for himself for several years and it was down to the strength of my mother that he died in comfort at home. She refused to allow him to go into a home (apart from a few days of respite care a year, for her own health and sanity) because she had heard terrible stories of people like him being starved or not properly looked after. Because her council would not pay, she had to use her savings to have carers visit several times a day, as it was a lot for a woman in her seventies to do. I live almost 300 miles away with a young family, so could not provide daily support. We watched him slowly deteriorate and at times, I hoped he would go out of pain peacefully but it didn't happen for a long time. That did not mean that I wanted him to die, but it was hard to see him barely existing. My father was not in a position to be able to change his mind had he put something in writing legally, to ask for euthanasia. That in turn would have put tremendous pressure on my mother and I and would have been a terribly hard decision to make. If I had made that decision, I would always have wondered if it had been the right one. I had always been in favour of assisted death for the sake of the person suffering, if that was what the wanted but when the situation arises when the person involved is incapable of communicating, the decision becomes more difficult.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86366
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

But, like it or not, there is

> something of a gulf between what might be a legal

> no-no, and what actually goes on. And it does go

> on.


I've been in the medical biz for a while now, including palliative care, and i'd have to say not in my experience. I'm not so naive as to totally deny the practice exists, but i have never seen evidence of it. regulation on practice, particularly post-shipman, is pretty good, and the professions are currently changing the culture around whistle-blowing, rather than the old medical "closing ranks" approach.


Unless, *Bob*, you have a very personal experience that you are drawing from, then I think we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one, because my personal experience is entirely unilateral.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86367
Share on other sites

bignumber5 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unless, *Bob*, you have a very personal experience

> that you are drawing from, then I think we'll just

> have to agree to disagree on this one, because my

> personal experience is entirely unilateral.


I don't know what to say now, so agreeing to disagree is probably the only option.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86372
Share on other sites

Hey MM, I am that religious nutter. See my stance on the abortion thread - at least I'm consistent.


It's a v. emotive subject and I certainly am not advocating that a person should suffer, I'm assuming some sort of palliative care would be taking place - we're not on a John Wayne battleground where a coup de grace is administered (but also not necessarily floating on a cloud of morphine induced haze that Jah is imagining as I think death is [am not actually going to try and explain what I mean right now cos Cheltenham is taking my attention and I'm out of nictotine and this one needs serious contemplation] )


Re 2., I do have some experience of this and I do know some medics collude in the practice, but my concern is that euthanasia is for the benefit of those who have to watch the suffering and can't bear it.


I will try and make sense of this rambling later - promise.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2806-assisted-dying/#findComment-86397
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
    • Exactly the same thing happened to me a few years back; they were after my Brompton. Luckily there were only 3 of them so I managed to get away and got a woman to call the police, then they backed off, but not after having hit me in the back of the head first. Police said next time just give them what they want, but I sure as hell wasn't just going to hand over my bike to them!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...