Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> weell - the straw poll of respondants on here so

> far suggests you are in the majority so by all

> means contact them and have a go at changing the

> situation

>

> As your upstairs however, do have a wave - I'm the

> Fr Ted figure at the back. the views of the Rye

> are lovely from up here... (tu)


Aaah, Fr Ted, now there a smoker...

As the amount of smoke I encounter goes down, so does my tolerance for it. Even though I don't smoke I used to like the smell of cigarette smoke in the pub - it was part of going out and part of the atmosphere. Now I find standing next to someone who reeks of smoke unpleasant.
yeh i have noticed the smoke also and its not just one driver.. i'm pleased other people have noticed it. i've kept meaning to make note of the bus registration number because years ago when i complained about a bus drivers attitude to me this was the main thing they asked me for.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> there WAS a smoker unfortuntately - RIP Dermot

> Morgan (ooh - same initials as Dulwich Mum)


Of course Dermot Morgsn died but as long as I have a DVD collection and the power in my thumbs to operate a remote control then Fr Ted will always exist.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm all for the smoking ban in public places, and

> I get the 63 bus every morning at the start of the

> journey.. but I wouldn't go so far as to call this

> "totally unnacceptable" - a bit of a nose-wrinkle

> at the start of a journey at worst


Smoking in a place of work is illegal. In what sense is the unacceptability of this offence not total.

Report the driver and get him sacked.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can't agree with this, some of them appear totally gormless and can't even look you in the eye or say a word when asked a straightforward question about the membership card at the till. The only cheerful person in there is Tom and he'll proactively talk to anyone about anything. That guy deserves more.
    • The person behind the till won't know about whether or not an assignment of their lease has been purchased by a company like Tesco.  Poundland was sold for a nominal fee so it's unsurprising that the location may close soon. As well, for what it's worth, someone working in the shop is likely to have their job impacted by the shop closing, so having loads of people going and asking them about the potential closing of their shop isn't really nice. "Hey, hear you'll be out of a job soon. Know much about that?" The best resource you all should be using for queries about planning details of new shops is the council's website. As was stated on the first page of this post, there's an application lodged for multiple changes at 29-35 Lordship Lane with the client as Tesco. They wouldn't lodge these plans unless it was happening, or at least extremely likely to happen.    The application is on the council's website here: https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=SVW246KBKF500&activeTab=summary 
    • It's a notice about a licence, but the only name on it is Poundland.
    • What did the notice on the front door say? The planning applications currently being considered clearly refer to Tesco Stores Ltd.  The signage for above the entrance says "Tesco Express". I can't imagine the two companies combining in the same space 😉  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...