Jump to content

Where do cyclists cross lordship lane safely?


Jakido

Recommended Posts

Where do people recommend is a good place to cross lordship lane for kids on bikes? Struggling to find anywhere that isn?t too busy, or which isn?t a pedestrian only crossing. I need somewhere between a goose Green and the Plough ideallyZ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crossing Lordship on a bike with kids isn't great at the moment - would definitely recommend a pedestrian crossing. Would be nice if there were some cycle crossings but without a safe mapped network to link to then its not so helpful. Some of the new road layouts around the Elephant are nice for this where there is a cycle section of the zebra crossing - also Norwood Road has one where Rosendale Road cycle lane meets it - but in both scenarios there is somewhere defined to cycle beyond the crossing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect that many reasonable motorists would allow kids to cross, I certainly would if I saw someone having problems. The bikeability courses will both help build confidence and get youngsters to communicate with drivers eg by getting eye contact. Drivers should not be exceeding 20mph.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There wouldn't be so much traffic on lordship lane if the council didnt close the roads as now the cars have no choice but to cause mayhem on lordship lane...

As for crossing the road as others have said the safest way is by using the crossings available cars will stop at them when lights are red or people are crossing it's only cyclists that continue to ride through red lights and crossings when people are crossing..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please don't encroach on pedestrian/wheelchair space by just "nipping onto the pavement" to cycle over the crossing. It takes an extra ten seconds to dismount, push bike, and remount. I am all in favour of cycle lanes, where needed and not duplicatory with bus lanes, etc., but I also think pedestrians need a space for their feet or wheels.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please don't encroach on pedestrian/wheelchair

> space by just "nipping onto the pavement" to cycle

> over the crossing. It takes an extra ten seconds

> to dismount, push bike, and remount. I am all in

> favour of cycle lanes, where needed and not

> duplicatory with bus lanes, etc., but I also think

> pedestrians need a space for their feet or wheels.

Totally agree with Nigello

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can?t have it both ways obvs.

If you use a PEDESTRIAN crossing, use it like a pedestrian, not as an 8 yard cycle Lane.


Jakido Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The problem I find with the crossing at the

> pedestrian crossings is you the end up having to

> walk/

> cycle on the pavement, which isn?t ideal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If not getting off and pushing across a pedestrian crossing, I?d say that the easiest access is to turn right out of Whatley and then down Blackwater. The pelican crossing gives you the opportunity to move out onto a clear road (and if there?s no-one there to activate it you can hop off your bike and press the button yourself.


I can?t think of another point where there?s a light activated crossing close enough to a junction, or that doesn?t have traffic approaching from another road. You could also turn left out of Whateley but that has the added complication of the bus stop and cars being released by the lights coming up behind you as you wait to turn right into Melbourne. Probably the safest place to cross over in the other direction though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree. Obviously shouldn?t cycle on the pavement. I suppose the particular challenge with most of the pedestrian crossings, eg opposite the coop, foxtons, near heber road junction is you can?t just get back on your bike straight away, you have to walk quite a bit of pavement before you can start cycling again if you?re going in the opposite direction to the traffic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodness, how many times would you suddenly need to change sides on LL with your children? If shopping why not tether your bikes and walk? If not shopping, then unclear why you cannot use pedestrian crossings along with everyone else?



hammerman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But there were only horse and carts in Victorian

> days.

>

> Things have changed and if you want to cycle with

> your children along busy roads and suddenly change

> sides you will have to either signal to change

> lanes or use crossings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well at least you didn’t live here when we used to have Concorde 😂 can’t lie though, I actually find it comforting, haven’t known anything different and only realised it was a thing when a visitor pointed it out last year. It’s when the helicopters come around that it gets annoying and that used to be fairly regular too. Before the area… changed…
    • As long as there are other ways to offer feedback, but also to speak to the council about this matter, then 1-1 feedback to GALA is not a problem, but an additional option. 
    • It's four bus stops away so hardly a deterrent unless one has mobility issues. Gala nor any other events organisers are under obligation to do what they've agreed to do. I'm sure if those who are serious and want to be heard will make the effort to attend the meeting. Whether their concerns have an impact or are taken seriously. Unless you can prove Gala have purposely chosen Peckham Levels as a means to deter people from attending i don't think it helps matters by implying that there's some sort of agenda or conspiracy going on. From following this thread it appears that's it's you with the agenda. Your display of arrogance in the post above ( Let's not pretend ) suggests that we're all in agreement with you.
    • I’m Greek, and I get my information directly from Greek media. I couldn't access the Economist article, but it doesn't seem very different from what I mentioned, apart from their ideological angle—and thanks for adding the actual text. If the government involves other private educational institutions, the situation will become more complicated indeed. However, I don't think it can be compared to the Greek situation for the reasons I mentioned and those in the Economist article, which I find prejudiced and patronizing, if not racist. (But a gap between ideology and real life is something with which many Greeks seem to live quite contented) Regarding the Economist's information, I'm not sure how many private schools closed, as the Economist claims, since the law only lasted for two months. I definitely know of one school in Piraeus called Michalopouleio, but given the law's brief duration, it can't be the sole reason.  Tsipras sending his sons to a private school does create an ethical problem. However, asking him to send his sons to a public school, when public education has been chronically neglected by right-wing governments, is similar to asking leftists to give away all their money.  Additionally, the right-wing government has introduced legislation that allows private colleges and universities this year, so there's no “problem” there anymore.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...