Jump to content

Recommended Posts

lozzyloz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To meet Boris is to believe he is a genuinely

> caring person.

>

> I'm sure his wife thought differently when she

> discovered his affair.

>

> I've not met either of them but at the end of the

> day they're both politicians so not 100%

> trustworthy. There's not much between them even if

> their ideology is different.

>

> On drink and drugs: Ken-Likes a Whisky, Boris

> prefers Cocaine

> On political cohesion: Ken was kicked out off

> Labour's National Executive for being radical,

> Boris was sacked from the Tory front bench for

> lying

> On misquotes: Ken misquoted on the 'Nazi' affair

> and Boris on the 'Water Melons and Piccannini'

> speech

> On love life: Ken has kids out of wedlock, Boris

> got caught

>

> The only major difference I can see is that Ken

> (who was born and brought up around the corner)

> has run London, pretty well IMO and Boris has no

> track record and was born in the US and educated

> in Brussels.


Neat analysis - but I believe Ken has done little for London and, if re-elected, would be for the worse.


I'm too tired of this thread to argue - I'm clearly in a minority, so I'll just cast my vote for Boris late tonight and we'll all see in a few months time whether Boris is failing or succeeding. Of course there's a real possibility that the Mayoral position has far less power than Ken claims* and we'll see very little difference at all.


* EG: Ken claiming that his policies have attracted business and capital to London - they were here well before Ken and they'll be here long after, unless the ever increasing congestion charges / zones and Labour's Non Dom policy (stolen I'd agree from Conservatives but given an inevitable level of added complexity and bureaucracy by New Labour) drive them out .

To meet Boris ... To meet Ken (which I haven't done


A fair trial? Not your usual standard of debate, MM - I might almost never agree with you on politics but I usually have to conceed that you argue a good case... this one is the same priciple employed by Northerners slating the South ;-)

bignumber5 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To meet Boris ... To meet Ken (which I haven't

> done

>

> A fair trial? Not your usual standard of debate,

> MM


I know I'm too tired to argue politics today. Try my other thread- it's more fun.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gits have moved my polling station without

> mentioning it to anyone on the estate.

> And you try looking on here for where your polling

> station is.

>

> http://www.londonelects.org.uk/

>

> You hunt around, find a place to put your postcode

> and it takes me to the southwark page. No shit

> sherlock!!, not to mention that my new polling

> station (having phoned up the electoral services

> commission, all a little bit late for my vote

> though) appears to be in Lambeth!!


The London Elects site is working now for checking polling station locations.

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm sure you are Mamora Man, but in Southwark at

> least you're in a minority.

> 48% Ken 29% Boris in Southwark and Lambeth.

>

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/elections/lo

> ndon/08/html/10.stm

>

> Small comfort for those of us who still believe

> Boris to be very bad news.


Practical experience, rather than beliefs and prejudice, will now tell - Boris has four years to prove me right and others wrong, or perhaps the other way around.


I agree I was in a minority, but I'm sticking to my guns. Boris Johnson and conservative policies will benefit London more than Ken and his divisive ideology.


Some left of centre commentators seem to pursuing an air of "this can't be right, the right is wrong so how can the electorate be so wrong headed as to vote for the Tories". It happens, many Tories felt the same in '97. Local elections are not a great guide to how the electorate will vote in a General Election but they do indicate a major change of opinion.


The New Labour "Emperor's Clothes" are beginning to be revealed as nothing more than an illusion. Power for power's sake (the Third Way?) is not enough - politicians must do something with their power.


I would argue that 11 (and ultimately 13) years of New Labour has achieved far less than the the previous 18 years of Conservative government. Like many I was fed up with the last conservative administration, it had grown old and tired. Despite this I cavassed for the Tories in '92 and '97 as I had no expectation of anything good from a Kinnock led Labour Party nor of a Blair led one. Neverthless, when Blair won in '97 I hoped that New Labour would take its opportunity to make a real difference, it could have done deals with public sector unions (including the Royal Colleges and similar professional bodies) that would have been impossible for a Tory government and might have truly transformed the NHS, education and social services. They failed - merely throwing buckets of money at them without reform. The quote "the new money was more like a tsunami than irrigation" was an apt description.

I'm sorry to see Ken go, I think he built the position of Mayor of London into a pivotal position for London and the whole country. I'd like to see Boris succeed (party colours to one side) because this city deserves all the help it can get to make it a better place to live in. Let's hope he really can have a positive impact on crime and our clogged up transport infrastructure over the next 4 years.

Mortified.


Tory voters must be feeling the momentary pride of Dr.Frankenstein watching his creation come to life, before realising what unspeakable things it would come to do.


MM - right you are, it's effectively a 4 year trial now, tho I suspect the next thread about Boris wont be that far away!

Asset wrote: Indeed. And what is possibly more concerning is that the BNP canditate came 5th with 69,000 votes


I doubt it becoming an earth shattering force in my lifetime, 69,000 out of eight million is less than 1% I suspect you will be retiring long before the bnp scrape in to the top three.


Asset you will have moved to your retirement farm in Tuscany and it will have little bearing on the quality of your life and pizza's.

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Asset wrote: Indeed. And what is possibly more

> concerning is that the BNP canditate came 5th with

> 69,000 votes

>

> I doubt it becoming an earth shattering force in

> my lifetime, 69,000 out of eight million is less

> than 1% I suspect you will be retiring long before

> the bnp scrape in to the top three.

>

> Asset you will have moved to your retirement farm

> in Tuscany and it will have little bearing on the

> quality of your life and pizza's.


What is concerning - and has become apparent since Asset first mentioned the figures that just related to the Mayoral contest - is that the BNP polled 130,714 votes in the London-wide poll (5.3%) and have secured a place on the Greater London Assembly.


For what it's worth (and I think that it provides a sliver of solace) the BNP vote in Lambeth and Southwark (4945) was the third lowest in London (out of 14) and accounted for just 3.8% of their total vote across the Capital. To put it in context, the average constituency vote for the BNP was 9337 votes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • of course most people would avoid the "stupid" term - but I'm sticking with it fact is no other European would be so dumb, and even with the same information, the  same media, the same everything, 2 of the countries within the UK saw ho stupid an idea it was - but only the English (who played a large part in the Welsh result) pushed ahead - there is something defiantly arrogant and stupid and it isn't just down to bad info and bad leadership But that was all 2016 - it's people in 2025 who claim it to be a good idea executed badly who are especially stupid Now - does calling people stupid help anyone? It's not especially politically gainful and just gets peoples' backs up - but it remains a truth and only when the country as a whole genuinely holds it's hands up and admits the stupidity (rather than downplaying it as a poor decision - no shade meant Mal - you are just nicer and politer than me) will it begin. to turn the tide Also worth mentioning that yes I am as intractable and blunt with friends and family who voted Leave as well - this isn't me hiding behind some online anonymous account. This is what I'm like
    • Hello My name is Lizzie and I work locally as a dog walker and nanny. I won’t be needed over Summer so will have full availability for a dogsitting job. I have a DBS certificate and will provide several dogsitting references as well. Please note that I can only watch your pet at your home since they are sadly not allowed in my flat! Looking forward to hear from you
    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...