Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bignumber5 Wrote:


> *Removing bendies: reactionary bollocks.


I disagree about these buses - they are too long for London roads, and bus drivers are among the worst behaved drivers on the road, driving like maniacs from stop to stop. Putting them in charge of an articulated vehicle 15 metres long is a bad idea.


We all know that many cyclists run red lights - but plenty don't, including me (and I'm not quite sure what it's got to do with bendy buses, other than that every time transport issues are mentioned on a public forum, people start ranting about bicycles going through red lights) - I hope you're equally contemptuous of motorcyclists' illegal occupation of advanced stop boxes - nothing makes me want to jump a red light more than arriving in an advanced stop box to find it full of filthy polluting motorbikes.


Bendy bus drivers often overtake cyclists as they approach a bus stop, thus crushing the cyclist against the kerb. This has happened to me on a couple of occasions.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For me the issue can be simplified slightly.

>

> Imagine the scenario, that hopefully will never happen. A major terrorist attack occurs in central London. Hundreds, if not thousands are dead. Widespread panic.

>

> Who would you want to see stepping through the smoke and rubble to try and bring the city back from the brink,


This has reminded me so much of Hilary Clinton's recent radio ad...


*Puts on deep American action movie trailer voice*


"While you sleep safely in your bed, there's a phone ringing somewhere... Blah blah blah... who do you want on the end of that line?" :-S


Just to add my 2p, I agree with Mike. Borris is a knob, that's obvious, and I won't be voting for him. However, I absolutely hate Ken, I really really do, and even if I agreed with ALL of his polocies (which I don't), I couldn't vote for the slimey jumped up little c**t!!!

I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of good resources (like the factcheck.org which keeps a track of US Presidential races) to allow the undecideds (like me) to make their minds up. Every discussion seems to be hugely polarised. I don't like Ken but I don't have any faith in Boris. I will probably vote for Paddick but I am also sure that it's my second choice which will be the one which winds up counting. And I have no idea who to give it to.


For what it's worth, I'm sorry that nobody from outside mainstream party politics has raised their hands and shown themselves to be a credible candidate. That surely gives a very poor message on the value placed on a contribution to British public life and London generally.

Oh right! Seems abit weird to pull someone up for a rant by having one yourself is all! MM is obviously quite passionate about his politics (the more so as he's isnt the predictable opinion). He had quite a rant on the Thatcher thread too as I recall.

Alan Dale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But TT, he's Big Sean MacGabhann. Just, fair and

> impartial. Caring and concerned. Considered and

> courteous. Hates Americans though.


LOL


> I was calling Keef a numpty because he called my

> mate Ken a see you next Tuesday. It's not the

> first time he's been called a numpty by any

> means.


And probably won't be the last, but I'll live with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I recently had a utility room built, next to the kitchen. Dean Richards and his team carried out the works, they did a fantastic job. Thorough, with attention to every detail.  If you are considering an extension, refurbishment or renovation, Dean comes highly recommended.  Dean Richards  07888 651798  
    • Thanks to all for the comments and advice.  I have now reported the incident to the police.
    • Thanks everyone for your comments, all of which I’ve taken something from. I originally posted to warn and help others learn from my experience – hence the title, first and last words of the post. However, the process of posting and reading your comments has helped me better make sense of what felt ‘off’ about the incident, why and what I’d do differently next time. I hadn’t expected this outcome, so thank you.  It’s also yielded several ‘golden nugget’ insights, one of which I share here for others. For context, I’m a longtime SE22 resident, who lives on a street with a primary school, so am used to scooting, cycling, walking with buggies, small children, pets etc. I like where I live and have never been struck on a pavement by anyone, on wheels or otherwise. I’ve been fortunate. When walking down Carlton Avenue towards Dulwich Village yesterday, I was on the left-hand side of the pavement but – ‘golden nugget’ approaching – not as close to people’s front garden walls as I could have been. The cyclist came from behind and overtook on the inside i.e. passed between me and the wall. The gap was too narrow and he hit my leg. For clarity, my original post was about the lack of adult supervision of a child. There’s been much comment here about the cyclist’s age. I didn’t know he was 4, until his father told me. I felt that this was a tactic – along with telling me I was over-reacting, talking about intent, apologising undercut with ‘but’ and laughing – to downplay and avoid taking responsibility for his part in the situation. But I accept that is my perception, readers weren’t there and may think differently. What also felt ‘off’ is that the father didn’t see what happened or ask any questions to find out. What happened? Where did he hit you? How hard? Are you alright? Is my son alright? Is everyone alright? This sounds obvious but wasn’t to me until last night. Back to age. Is the age of the cyclist important? If you consider it from the perspective of a four-year-old, it might be. He’s on his bike, helmet on, speeding along, sees a gap and thinks he can get through it. He doesn’t know and/or may never have been told about the risks (to himself and others) of undertaking on the left. Hits pedestrian. I was not expecting to be hit from behind or the undertaking. But had I walked closer to the wall – and not left a potentially inviting gap – this probably wouldn’t have happened. This is just one ‘golden nugget’ I will take away. It’s something I can easily do, doesn’t depend on anyone else doing anything differently, and could contribute towards keeping myself and others safe. All in all, posting here has been unexpectedly useful for me. I hope for others, too. I feel able to move forward with learnings, so thank you guys.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...