Jump to content

House renovation - new kitchen design and complete chimney removal - where to start?


riggsy

Recommended Posts

Hello all


I'm one of those new generation of blokes that just doesn't have any clue when it comes to matters DIY but hoping some kind soul out there can guide me in the right direction.


My wife and I live in a lovely 3 bed terrace but the 3rd bedroom is tiny because of the chimney stack - we want to remove this and, with the neighbour's consent, the shared stack above the roof line (note this is the back chimney i.e. not the one that goes through the loft). We also want to go the full hog and remove the rest of the chimney downstairs into the kitchen and redesign and fit something new, add a window or two and big folding doors onto the v.v.v.v. small back garden.


Basically I haven't a clue where to start - essentially if the Chimney is a no go then may need to rethink everything but should I get a structural engineer round to assess this? do I simply get a builder in to advise on whether this is/or not possible and for all the design work do you need to appoint surveyors/architects or again do the builders do all of this?


Realise I need to get party wall agreements and so forth but at this stage I just want a wise head to have a look at all this and tell me if it is possible and what steps to follow.


Anyone done anything similar and can pass on some wise words/advise/recommendation for me? Best response gets a Riggsy beer voucher to be redeemed at any East Dulwich pub!


Thanks all

We thought about doing this exact same thing. For us, the only option would have been the complete removal of the stack and chimney. From memory, we were advised we would have definately needed building regs approval for this work and that would have required the submission of drawings and structural engineer's report saying it was fine.


So, it was certainly possible for us from a structural perspective, although your position may be different - you need to get some advice on this and I can recommend Goddens Structural, who have been recommended a number of times on this forum. They would be my first port of call. They may tell you "yes" or "no" in 5 mins.


If you do it then you'll then need to make good the roof and both floors. The removal of the stack and chimney may also cause some damage to your neighbour's property and you will be liable for this too.


We read up on this extensively and ultimately decided not to proceed with it because:


- the likely cost (we thought over ?5K after all the making good, scaffolding etc) was hard to justify given the fact the extra room it would create would not be that significant.

- it would be an enormous hassle and extremely dirty.

Hi there


We are having similar work done at the moment in that we are having a chimney breast and load bearing wall removed. We got a few builders round to quote and it seems that they tend to have a structural engineer that they regularly work with and they will give you the contact details for this person if they need plans to work from. So for us it was the builder first, then the structural engineer to draw up the plans and do any calculations necessary.


I'm pretty sure you will need to contact building control at the council because you are making structural changes and I would be tempted to ring them up and ask them for their advice in terms of the changes you are planning to make and the best way for you to approach it.


Building control will want to send a surveyor round to check everything once the work is done and this will cost a few hundred quid, ask building control to clarify this for you. I've pointed it out as it's one of those hidden costs that you don't necessarily think about at the outset.

Hi Riggsy,


Wow - sounds a very exciting project! I agree with Trizza - a decent builder will work closely with a structural engineer so get in touch with a builder first. And if you want a great one - try David O'Brien. He did 2 extensions on my last house and has just finished my kitchen. I enjoyed the whole experience so much I'd gladly do it all again! If you call him mention me (Vicky). 07960 938621

Riggsy,


I am a Chartered Civil Engineer with plenty of experience of this kind of work and the Party Wall Act. I would be happy to come and take a look if you like.


Mark Taylor B.Eng.(Hons) C.Eng. M.I.C.E.

TORCAL Ltd.

Consulting Engineers

Tel. 01622 745512 Mobile 07450 371508

email: [email protected]

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...