Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lucinda Vs Raef would be my ideal final... However, from the footage they've shown of next week, Lucinda seems to be having a row with someone, hope she doesn't slip now... They're making an ad for tissues next week, and the clips also suggested that Alex might get a bit carried away with the "art of film"... That said, they are good at not giving much away with these teasers.


Couldn't say much to defend Sara last night, other than to say Micheal is worse, and should have gone... How did he manage to talk himself in to next week at the end, is Alan going soft?!?!? Nick looked shocked that he'd let Micheal off.


Despite wanting Lucinder & Raef, my money is on Clare Vs Lee.

it was pretty cringe worthy -"please let me stay Sir Alan, please". if it had been me, i would've booted Micheal off too - just for that performance. but then i guess two leaving in one show can't continue, or the series wouldn't last as long!


totally agree on Raef's comment -i was laughing out loud at that one too!

Michael is the worst kind of snobby, sulky, supercilious over-indulged public school prat. Had he been born to a poor family he'd be stacking shelves somewhere. However his privilege has given him the false impression that he deserves to succeed.


I agree with Margaret's appraisal when she was told he read Classics at Edinburgh. "Edinburgh isn't what it used to be." Spot on.

I hoped Lucinder would have a chance, but can't see her doing it now. Lee and Alex dumped her, but she just whinged about it, and tried to show how mean they'd been, rather than just getting on with it. I think had she just gotten on with the job, Alan Sugar would have been impressed, as he knew she'd been dumped by the lads.


Lee is basically a bit thick, Alex has been a horrid bully since episode 1, and still is. Helene has no chance at all, so I'd have to agree that Claire is strong favourite...


Have to agree that Micheal actually came across as quite a nice bloke on the "You're Fired" show. He was basically playing the game, and very nearly slipped through.

Yeah i think you're right Jimbo1964 Claire used to annoy me a lot but think she has taken the criticism on board well and has made some changes. liked when she said that she is trying to regulate her talking and AS saying she had a moouth the size of blackwall tunnel


shame about lucinda whinging so much yes -she would have got more credit had she just got on with it. although having said that i think she's a better manager than a do-er, and definitely a better manager than lee and alex.

Well that was rubbish, wasn't it? I wanted to see Helene and Alex get minced, re-shaped into patties, grilled till charred and then thrown to the pigs. Disappointed.


And SRalan and his cronies are a bunch of sexist old gits - Lucinda would be good at interior design and decorating the board room, chuckle chuckle. How does she gross 100k pa contracting, then? That's a lot of candles to sell.


And SirAlan's "Nice to have a lady's view" to Karen Brady - shown his true colours there the patronising twunt. I hope he either picks fame-hungry passive aggressive nutjob Claire, or defensive, holllow streak of piss Alex, or even manipulative eye-roller Helen - he deserves all of them to be honest.


(stop me if I'm taking this too seriously, someone)

I thought her interviews seemed a bit... weak, I suppose. Although maybe that's just in comparison to the other ones.


Also, did anyone else spot the slight spoiler in the clips from the final with Sirallun giving his reasons for firing the last three rejects? Looked to me like they'd inadvertently revealed the gender of the winner, and from that it's not too big a leap to predict who'd get it. (Can't remember now but they may have only been shown on the end of the You're Fired show on BBC2.)

It had its moments, but was a bit of a let-down compared to previous 'CV' episodes.

As ever, the need to continually up the television ante every series has turned it into too much of a circus.


The bald interviewee was completely wank this time. "I'M TOUGH! LOOK AT MY SHINY HOT HEAD! I MEAN BUSINESS!". These are supposed to be real people, ask them to act and it's just rubbish.


Who would I employ? Hmm..


Well Helene's eyes are too far apart, and sometimes seem to move independently - like a tree frog.

Claire just needs a cork in the mouth and a bowl of wee tipping on her head. If I see her do that eyes-looky-up-to-the-left/nose-wrinkle combo thing again I may have to do something drastic like, say, leaving the room and put the kettle on.

Alex is out on the grounds that he has a mouth like a cat's arsehole and cruel, pink, thin 'Joker Lips'.


So that leaves Lee. Who I quite like, for some reason.

Ha Ha.. how many wrappers do you have to save to get one of those?


I think you're right about SRalan though.

Chipping away at the edges of his likeable grizzly no-nonsense merit-based boy-dunn-good persona is a bit of a tetchy old-skool (ie sexist) knob. Still a likeable knob though. At the moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...