Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Like the turds on the street, these threads are hard to miss.


I am still not sure what the purpose of moaning about poo on the forum is. It wont move the poo.


Contact the councillors directly (details regularly posted on the forum), or speak to the owners at the time (where possible).

"I am still not sure what the purpose of moaning about poo on the forum is"


Perhaps the purpose could be for those of us who have a dog to prove their innocence and thereby remove themselves from any associated opprobrium. So here goes:


I have never walked my dog down Beauval Road. If I did and it crapped I would pick it up.


Will others follow my example?

Yet again we have an inflamatory thread with an implied group aspersion as its subject line.


I am not a dog owner. I do feel that continually singling out any group in society is not appropriate. Even if then limiting your wrath to "just the bad ones".


Just my thoughts.

I'm with Lane Lover (again). I read this because the title was 'Dog Owners' - which I am. I have read all the threads on dog sh*t and I have not noticed any less of it around. You are wasting your time - we ALL hate it, no-one thinks, 'ooh goody another pile of dog mess'....Clearly the lazy assholes aren't readers of this forum, or they are and they don't care. But people constantly moaning about it in threads such as this as opposed to getting in touch with whomever can suposedly make a difference, really is a bit tedious.
I know many responsible dog owners and accept my post was borne of anger BUT please do not say we should let it pass as it happens and can't be altered. I have said sorry for the generalisation but do not care who I annoy if I continue to complain about having to throw away decent shoes because a limited number of dog owners behave like arses? As long as there is one ED dog owner who refusesto clean up then people have the right to complain

To be fair to OP, lots of threads on the EDF are essentially not going to change anything at all ever, but they are still here. We rant about stuff we want to rant about, probably without expecting much to change. It's just the way we are, innit.


Lots of love,


Crap Clearing Dog Owner.

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be fair to OP, lots of threads on the EDF are

> essentially not going to change anything at all

> ever, but they are still here. We rant about stuff

> we want to rant about, probably without expecting

> much to change. It's just the way we are, innit.

>

> Lots of love,

>

> Crap Clearing Dog Owner.


Agreed. AND if a bit of venting makes someone feel better about a genuine issue then what's the harm? No one's forced to read the thread...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...