Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Extract from

Southwark Council Minutes:


Deborah McKenzie from public realm updated the meeting on proposed works at Camberwell Old Cemetery. Deborah explained that the council looked after 3 cemeteries in the borough, Camberwell Old, Camberwell New and Nunhead. All 3 were running out of space for burial. Deborah introduced Paul Harrison, a landscape architect working for the council, to explain some of the long terms changes which would be taking place at Camberwell Old cemetery this year.


Paul explained that an area had been identified on the south side of the cemetery alongside Wood Vale, near to the Lewisham boundary. This had been an area of public burial up to the 1920s and 1940s with no real monuments and no rights to graves. Paul explained that traditionally soil was brought into cemeteries and placed over the top of existing graves so further burials could continue on the raised level. This method had taken place on the site pre-war. It was proposed that this method be used again in the area identified. This would require some removal of trees but a number of trees in that location were of poor quality and new tree planting would be done. The work was planned for late summer and would last approximately 12 weeks, with a new access to the cemetery required off Wood Vale for lorries. The proposals were subject to planning approval which was currently being applied for.

I live right by where the works are being carried out There were notices on the front gates last year and on the gates on Langton rise/woodvale with the names of the graves which were to be covered & asking anyone who was related or knows of the families involved to contact the council. I am assuming (hoping) this is because they had tried all other channels and were making sure the graves still didn't have any visitors still. I walked passed the Area a lot as i walk through sometimes to get to forest hill road, I didn't notice many graves in that area, and the few I did see looked very old and neglected.

I thought it was sad they had to destroy some of the trees though, clearing something living for the dead ;/

I think this is common practice though, My grandparents graves in hertfordshire from the 1990's have a 50 yr "Expiry date" I think a clause in the contract says that if no relatives come forward at that time to renew them they will be reused.

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,563303,564950


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,563303,564950


This went through in 2010 and 2011


The councillor in charge is uniquely without new ideas and people skills. Bulldozers and trucks and cement seem to be the people's will and the lowest common denominator. I do not get why we are never asked to change the way we do thinks, asked to evolve to greener, less wasteful


http://sunrisingburialground.co.uk/memorials/trees.html


http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/0/19272231


http://bigthink.com/design-for-good/


Why not trees as memorials with benches under them? Orchards which make jams and are harvested and people are remembered forever with living produce: Auntie's favourite blackberry jam


I just don't get this complete lack of imagination.

The area that is being filled-in (and the surface raised by about 4 foot) was regularly (certainly along the Langton Rise boundary) heavily waterlogged in the winter - and would have been completely unsuitable for continued burials. So something had to be done, although what that is may not necessarily be what has actually been done.


We will need to see what the 'remedial' re-planting will be - taking into account the narrowing group of native trees that aren't being infected by 'foreign' pathogens - but right now the Wood Vale/ Langton corner looks a complete mess - and is certainly taking far longer to complete than was planned. Like so many 'works' in SE London it is quite rare to see anyone actually working on them.


It would be nice to see flowering and fruiting trees being planted - though how practical that is in a cemetary I am not sure. I am also assuming that the unpathed elements will be re-seeded with grass seeds. Again wild meadow grasses with wild flowers would be a positive addition to the area, but I would presume that this wouldn't be consistent with regular mowing that I am sure will be scheduled.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the Wood Vale/ Langton corner looks a complete

> mess - and is certainly taking far longer to

> complete than was planned. Like so many 'works' in

> SE London it is quite rare to see anyone actually

> working on them.

>


Is this a F.M.Conway contract?


John K

Hello all, there was extensive consultation over this, there were public meetings (Open days with Council Officer attending at Honor Oak Rec, Camberwell Old Cemetery and a meeting at Tooley Street). The easiest and cheapest option was to have used Honor Oak Rec. Both local councillors and residents said no to this option.

There was an extensive tree survey in this area of Camberwell Old Cemetery. Trees that are being removed are on the whole structural unsound or diseased. There will be new trees planted and also extensive planting along the boundary with Wood Vale. I know many people don't want a traditional burial, but there are also people who for personal or religious reasons do. It was clear from the survey that residents do want the option in Southwark of a traditional burial. For this reason Mynamehere, your suggestions would appeal to some but not all of Southwark's residents.

I shall find out re schedule on this.


Renata

Walking by the cemetery yesterday (Sunday) I noticed a large number of plants put out waiting for planting, including a lot of (I assume ground) ivy, some dogwood (I think) some either cypresses or (which would be traditional) yew trees, some broad leaf deciduous trees etc. All quite small (nothing seemed taller than 5-6 ft) but it does look like a very positive move.

For 'very overgrown with trees' please substitute 'a most valuable wild life resource, which we should treasure as it is home to East Dulwich's songbirds'



Many old-timers remember camping here as children!


.....it is also home to a great many wrecked 19th century memorials, huge numbers of seedling sycamores, and a patch of Japanese knotweed (cordoned off for herbicidal spray at present).


Please, folks, help me conserve this lovely area of haphazard woodland. In the middle of a great noisy sprawling city here's a piece of refuge for all who love genuine biodiversity. All it really needs is an occasional litter pick, broken glass and plastic don't belong here. The fly tippers over the wooden fence along Underhill Rd, who are messing up a nature reserve in effect, need to know that from the houses opposite we can record their selfish behaviour, includng taking van registration plate numbers.


Another thing, 300,000 people have been buried over the many centuries of Camberwell Old Cemetery's life. It is likely that each gravesite has already been the final resting place of four people, on average. In these hallowed places it is surely more civilised not to instigate too much of a 'clear-up'.


The rebuilding over on Wood Vale side is almost complete and was scheduled to provide gravesites for 2,000 more dreamers. I won't be one of them; have asked for my ashes to be sprinkled in any piece of favourite woodland my children choose, and we are very sorry to see how many of COC's graves get flooded on the unstable London clay.

If Councils in London are going to keep offering people the option to be buried, the choice is either to reuse existing graveyards (something which has always happened in English history, happens in every other urban area in the world, and in the UK) or - and this bonkers idea has been unique to Southwark - start turning the few remaining urban public parks into graveyards.


Southwark has been unique, over the last 40 years of so, of having a vociferous group of individuals who were distorting the policy on burial, by objecting to any reuse of the existing cemeteries. Parts of Nunhead Cemetery and Camberwell Old Cemetery were destined to be carefully reused following a comprehensive survey of those sites in the 1970s. A small group of graveyard enthusiasts lobbied - mostly behind the scenes - to stop this happening. In 1991, the then Cemeteries Manager, together with this same small group, developed a plan to get a large part of Honor Oak Rec turned into a graveyard instead of following the balanced and sustainable plan for reuse of the existing cemeteries - a plan that had been carefully developed in good time in the 1970s to provide for the coming "burial shortage". This left Southwark as the only council in the country which was prepared to turn an urban park into a graveyard - every other local authority in the country having decided that if they were going to carry on using burial plots, reuse was the way ahead.


There has been extensive publicity about the plans for the cemeteries in Southwark since 1991, when the original Friends of Honor Oak Rec group started up, and let people know about what had been happening behind the scenes. FOHORG managed to stop Southwark Council turning the whole of Honor Oak Rec into a graveyard. Honor Oak Rec is a heavily used inner city park with fantastic views out over Kent, providing the only open space for, among others, over 3,000 people and many young families living on the high density Honor Oak Estate.


Councils don't have to offer burial at all and graveyards are hugely expensive to maintain - only a minority want burial but for some reason we are all made to pay for it. Burial is an expensive personal choice (whether for religious or other reasons) and it's not clear to me why the heavy ongoing cost of this personal choice comes out of public funds when essential services for the living have been chopped.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...