Jump to content

camberwell old cemetary


Recommended Posts

Is this actually happening? If so I a, horrified. I have family and know of other people with family buried there and have not received any warning. This is an utter disgrace if this is what is happening. Where do I get more information on this?


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extract from

Southwark Council Minutes:


Deborah McKenzie from public realm updated the meeting on proposed works at Camberwell Old Cemetery. Deborah explained that the council looked after 3 cemeteries in the borough, Camberwell Old, Camberwell New and Nunhead. All 3 were running out of space for burial. Deborah introduced Paul Harrison, a landscape architect working for the council, to explain some of the long terms changes which would be taking place at Camberwell Old cemetery this year.


Paul explained that an area had been identified on the south side of the cemetery alongside Wood Vale, near to the Lewisham boundary. This had been an area of public burial up to the 1920s and 1940s with no real monuments and no rights to graves. Paul explained that traditionally soil was brought into cemeteries and placed over the top of existing graves so further burials could continue on the raised level. This method had taken place on the site pre-war. It was proposed that this method be used again in the area identified. This would require some removal of trees but a number of trees in that location were of poor quality and new tree planting would be done. The work was planned for late summer and would last approximately 12 weeks, with a new access to the cemetery required off Wood Vale for lorries. The proposals were subject to planning approval which was currently being applied for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live right by where the works are being carried out There were notices on the front gates last year and on the gates on Langton rise/woodvale with the names of the graves which were to be covered & asking anyone who was related or knows of the families involved to contact the council. I am assuming (hoping) this is because they had tried all other channels and were making sure the graves still didn't have any visitors still. I walked passed the Area a lot as i walk through sometimes to get to forest hill road, I didn't notice many graves in that area, and the few I did see looked very old and neglected.

I thought it was sad they had to destroy some of the trees though, clearing something living for the dead ;/

I think this is common practice though, My grandparents graves in hertfordshire from the 1990's have a 50 yr "Expiry date" I think a clause in the contract says that if no relatives come forward at that time to renew them they will be reused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,563303,564950


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,563303,564950


This went through in 2010 and 2011


The councillor in charge is uniquely without new ideas and people skills. Bulldozers and trucks and cement seem to be the people's will and the lowest common denominator. I do not get why we are never asked to change the way we do thinks, asked to evolve to greener, less wasteful


http://sunrisingburialground.co.uk/memorials/trees.html


http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/0/19272231


http://bigthink.com/design-for-good/


Why not trees as memorials with benches under them? Orchards which make jams and are harvested and people are remembered forever with living produce: Auntie's favourite blackberry jam


I just don't get this complete lack of imagination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The area that is being filled-in (and the surface raised by about 4 foot) was regularly (certainly along the Langton Rise boundary) heavily waterlogged in the winter - and would have been completely unsuitable for continued burials. So something had to be done, although what that is may not necessarily be what has actually been done.


We will need to see what the 'remedial' re-planting will be - taking into account the narrowing group of native trees that aren't being infected by 'foreign' pathogens - but right now the Wood Vale/ Langton corner looks a complete mess - and is certainly taking far longer to complete than was planned. Like so many 'works' in SE London it is quite rare to see anyone actually working on them.


It would be nice to see flowering and fruiting trees being planted - though how practical that is in a cemetary I am not sure. I am also assuming that the unpathed elements will be re-seeded with grass seeds. Again wild meadow grasses with wild flowers would be a positive addition to the area, but I would presume that this wouldn't be consistent with regular mowing that I am sure will be scheduled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the Wood Vale/ Langton corner looks a complete

> mess - and is certainly taking far longer to

> complete than was planned. Like so many 'works' in

> SE London it is quite rare to see anyone actually

> working on them.

>


Is this a F.M.Conway contract?


John K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello all, there was extensive consultation over this, there were public meetings (Open days with Council Officer attending at Honor Oak Rec, Camberwell Old Cemetery and a meeting at Tooley Street). The easiest and cheapest option was to have used Honor Oak Rec. Both local councillors and residents said no to this option.

There was an extensive tree survey in this area of Camberwell Old Cemetery. Trees that are being removed are on the whole structural unsound or diseased. There will be new trees planted and also extensive planting along the boundary with Wood Vale. I know many people don't want a traditional burial, but there are also people who for personal or religious reasons do. It was clear from the survey that residents do want the option in Southwark of a traditional burial. For this reason Mynamehere, your suggestions would appeal to some but not all of Southwark's residents.

I shall find out re schedule on this.


Renata

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walking by the cemetery yesterday (Sunday) I noticed a large number of plants put out waiting for planting, including a lot of (I assume ground) ivy, some dogwood (I think) some either cypresses or (which would be traditional) yew trees, some broad leaf deciduous trees etc. All quite small (nothing seemed taller than 5-6 ft) but it does look like a very positive move.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For 'very overgrown with trees' please substitute 'a most valuable wild life resource, which we should treasure as it is home to East Dulwich's songbirds'



Many old-timers remember camping here as children!


.....it is also home to a great many wrecked 19th century memorials, huge numbers of seedling sycamores, and a patch of Japanese knotweed (cordoned off for herbicidal spray at present).


Please, folks, help me conserve this lovely area of haphazard woodland. In the middle of a great noisy sprawling city here's a piece of refuge for all who love genuine biodiversity. All it really needs is an occasional litter pick, broken glass and plastic don't belong here. The fly tippers over the wooden fence along Underhill Rd, who are messing up a nature reserve in effect, need to know that from the houses opposite we can record their selfish behaviour, includng taking van registration plate numbers.


Another thing, 300,000 people have been buried over the many centuries of Camberwell Old Cemetery's life. It is likely that each gravesite has already been the final resting place of four people, on average. In these hallowed places it is surely more civilised not to instigate too much of a 'clear-up'.


The rebuilding over on Wood Vale side is almost complete and was scheduled to provide gravesites for 2,000 more dreamers. I won't be one of them; have asked for my ashes to be sprinkled in any piece of favourite woodland my children choose, and we are very sorry to see how many of COC's graves get flooded on the unstable London clay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Councils in London are going to keep offering people the option to be buried, the choice is either to reuse existing graveyards (something which has always happened in English history, happens in every other urban area in the world, and in the UK) or - and this bonkers idea has been unique to Southwark - start turning the few remaining urban public parks into graveyards.


Southwark has been unique, over the last 40 years of so, of having a vociferous group of individuals who were distorting the policy on burial, by objecting to any reuse of the existing cemeteries. Parts of Nunhead Cemetery and Camberwell Old Cemetery were destined to be carefully reused following a comprehensive survey of those sites in the 1970s. A small group of graveyard enthusiasts lobbied - mostly behind the scenes - to stop this happening. In 1991, the then Cemeteries Manager, together with this same small group, developed a plan to get a large part of Honor Oak Rec turned into a graveyard instead of following the balanced and sustainable plan for reuse of the existing cemeteries - a plan that had been carefully developed in good time in the 1970s to provide for the coming "burial shortage". This left Southwark as the only council in the country which was prepared to turn an urban park into a graveyard - every other local authority in the country having decided that if they were going to carry on using burial plots, reuse was the way ahead.


There has been extensive publicity about the plans for the cemeteries in Southwark since 1991, when the original Friends of Honor Oak Rec group started up, and let people know about what had been happening behind the scenes. FOHORG managed to stop Southwark Council turning the whole of Honor Oak Rec into a graveyard. Honor Oak Rec is a heavily used inner city park with fantastic views out over Kent, providing the only open space for, among others, over 3,000 people and many young families living on the high density Honor Oak Estate.


Councils don't have to offer burial at all and graveyards are hugely expensive to maintain - only a minority want burial but for some reason we are all made to pay for it. Burial is an expensive personal choice (whether for religious or other reasons) and it's not clear to me why the heavy ongoing cost of this personal choice comes out of public funds when essential services for the living have been chopped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Noted. I wasn't quite sure from their material whether the 'ad lib' supply by pharmacists had to be mandated; hence the suggestion to check.  There are plenty of individual manufacturers of generic methylphenidate, probably quite a bit cheaper too.  I'm afraid I didn't see radnrach's "can't really take an alternative", so apologies for presuming otherwise.  For myself I'm generally willing to trust that any manufacturer's offering of, say, 27 mg methylphenidate hydrochloride tabs, would contain that, and I'm not too worried about the minor quirks of things like their slow-release technology. I think it's likely that the medicines Serious Shortage Protocol does definitely give pharmacists some degrees of freedom. But it's apparently not in operation here. See the Minister's recent reply to a written question: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-11-13/1660#.   , which seems to approximate to: we can't apply the shortage protocol here because the drugs are in short supply.
    • I'm not sure pharmacists have any discretion to alter specific medication prescriptions, although they can choose supplier where a generic is prescribed which may be offered by more than one company. This will only be for older medicines which are effectively 'out of copyright' . They can't issue alternatives on their own authority as they don't know what counter-indications there may be for specific patients. GPs may prescribe a specific supplier of a generic medicine where, for instance, they know patients have an adverse reaction to e.g. the medicine casings, so the Nottinghamshire directive to specify only generics where available may not always be helpful. 
    • I see that in Nottinghamshire the local NHS Area Prescribing Committee is recommending that prescriptions should be for generic methylphenidate, giving their pharmacists the option of supplying any brand (or presumably a generic product). https://www.nottsapc.nhs.uk/media/bw5df5pu/methylphenidate-pil.pdf It might be worth checking with your local pharmacist(s) to see whether this will help them if, as I suppose would be necessary, your GP issues a replacement prescription. I'll have a look around our local NHS websites now, to see if I can find anything there.  Nottingham, btw, provide more information, nominally for clinicians, at https://www.nottsapc.nhs.uk/media/vwxjkaxa/adhd-medicines-supply-advice.pdf.  And at https://www.nottsapc.nhs.uk/adhd-shortages/.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...