Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hipsters (at least what we mean by that in the US) are seen as a new breed that have emerged in the last 20 years or so. There have always been cool / art-house kids. When someone says ?hipster? to me though what that usually means is a lack of authenticity. A very shallow follower of a mish-mash of trends without any real depth of passion or understanding. Hipsters are obsessed with the appearance and image of things but lack any true conviction or appreciation of anything. Pop culture (to some extent) has always been like that, so there?s nothing new there. What's unusual is they take themselves to be making some sort of counter-culture statement. That and the worship of everything retro. In the past being counter-culture was about expressing a new / fringe aesthetic or philosophy not some asinine regurgitation of the past.

Definitely not crusty - more Pulp and St Martins and fanzines than whirlygig and dogs on strings.


and LondonMix, how on earth do you determine a lack of authenticity just by looking at someone? And if that's the criterion for judgment, then those old school art house types are just as guilty - have you never listened to Common People?

The word 'hipster' has been popularised by a small but powerful group of London journos/musos/fashonistas who, wanting to burnish their impeccable Ny-Lon credentials, have imported it. Five years ago or less, 'hipster' was really only used in the US. What's wrong with the lovely, old-fashioned and instantly recognisable '(Shoreditch) Twat' or 'trendy'? I loathe the word (as I do 'cool' and 'guys'.) When The Daily Mail and its ilk use 'hipster' you know its time is well past its prime.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hipsters (at least what we mean by that in the US)

> are seen as a new breed that have emerged in the

> last 20 years or so. There have always been cool

> / art-house kids. When someone says ?hipster? to

> me though what that usually means is a lack of

> authenticity. A very shallow follower of a

> mish-mash of trends without any real depth of

> passion or understanding. Hipsters are obsessed

> with the appearance and image of things but lack

> any true conviction or appreciation of anything.

> Pop culture (to some extent) has always been like

> that, so there?s nothing new there. What's

> unusual is they take themselves to be making some

> sort of counter-culture statement. That and

> the worship of everything retro. In the past

> being counter-culture was about expressing a new /

> fringe aesthetic or philosophy not some asinine

> regurgitation of the past.



or to summarise, wankers.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What were all those Covent Gdn dwellers in the 80s

> who all (male and female) had old style wedgie

> hairdos & wore waxed DMs, black 501s with thin

> sweaters (tucked in!) and RayBans called? (apart

> from @#$%& woody)


Erm.....


Bros ?

On a corner of Hoxton st. two nights ago I encountered two young heavily bearded chaps who would probably be hipster/lumbo types when fully clothed but they were each wearing tight, shiny, matching shorts and vests over their skinny frames and were sweating a lot, they looked like athlete hostages who had been chained to a radiator for a month.


"That's your fastest 5k ever" said one, "Great" said the other.


*shudders*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...