Jump to content

The Grove Tavern


Balders

Recommended Posts

I have just been told by someone with reliable council and Dulwich Estates contacts that The Grove Tavern has an application pending for change of use to "Retail and Residential". That would seem to indicate a supermarket and given that Tesco build houses they would be the most likely of the ususal suspects.


With very few residential properties around it they would not have had to inform many people so thios one seems to be getting under the radar.


How do people feel about it?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30525-the-grove-tavern/
Share on other sites

I'd hate to see it not become a pub - good building, a garden, near the woods, a history etc etc


But it hasn't been a viable pub for many many years has it?


It has a big old footprint, so would provide a fair bit of (no doubt fugly) housing


In this instance I can see the benefit of changing the usage

What a surprise.....

It's perfectly viable at the right price. If change of use was out of the question then the market would find the price at which it becomes viable.

Do we want a total loss of amenity in the area because almost any site is more profitable when carved up for flats at this particular moment in time?

Lets face it, the owners haven't tried very hard to make it work. They took it over, there was a fire, following which they allowed it to stay vacant for an extended period and now they've put in for change of use.

How about they fix it up and try running it as a pub for a bit?

There's no application currently live on the planning portal, but one of the College councillors (I think) mentioned they had heard the same plan to turn it into part retail, part residential. It's a big site and a small mixed retail, social housing development could work well, since the view appears to be the Harvester building (original use) is beyond commercial repair post the fire.

When would you last say it was a viable pub rahrahrah?


The market is finding it's level by determining the best use of the property (after years of none of the usual players in the pub/restaurant market showing any interest) .


I'm not saying the market and I want the same outcome but if you are going to use the market as an arbitrer..

It has only been empty since the fire. Before that it has been an operational business for as long as I can remember. It was only fairly recently sold to the present owner, who presumably considered it a viable going concern? By allowing change of use when the purchasers haven't even attempted to run it for the purpose that it was ostensibly purchased for, you give out a bad message.

Taken to the extreme, you end up with amenity levels that are effectively a snapshot of an area at it?s lowest level of retail demand. You strip out amenity because ?no one wants to see empty shops? during times when demand is low (or residential demand is very high). Well actually you see empty shops because landlords refuse to be realistic about the true value of their units within a retail market, or because the possibility of conversion to flats (which are more profitable) is an incentive for dereliction. Clearly it will be more profitably as flats, than a restaurant / pub. So you allow a leaking of more and more units into the residential market to the detriment of a local area.

If there was a much higher bar for minimum amenity levels then the market would find the proper price and viability wouldn't be such an issue. If all those shop-to-flat conversions on North cross road / upland road had been prevented you would have considerably cheaper retail rents in the area and a much more vital commercial environment.

I understand it was a very popular pub back in the day but I?ve been going to that place in different incarnations for 12 years


And every one of those incarnations had ?dead man walking? written all over it. Mitchel & Butlers tried upmarket and downmarket before selling it on. Latest owners were, from a customer standpoint, woeful. And then it burnt out.


I?m saying it wasn?t an amenity many people cared for. Big money owners came and went. Small money owners came and went. Only people who didn?t were customers


All this at a time when someone like Capital pubs were buying up any square foot in London which could be used to sell beer and food


The market wasn?t interested in it


At this point I?m not too fussed what it becomes ? it?s on the corner of a stupidly busy junction already. It?s hard to imagine it being any worse, regardless of use

The newish flats already there were built on part of what wss once pub garden.


They chose to model the flats on the blocks next to the site - shitty council flats, so we can assuredly look forward to an imagination free development.


Unless we demand they build one of these!


http://alleganchamber.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/regenttheatre.jpg

Same Old Story... Everywhere


Pub Fire.. Insurance claim .. Redevelop to flate or offices..




Tigers Head Catford.. Pub Fire.. Insurance claim ?.. Redevelop to flate or offices..


The Green Man Pub Catford.. Pub Fire.. Insurance claim ?.. Redevelop to flate or offices..


The Baring Arms. Grove Park.. Pub Fire.. Insurance claim ?.. Redevelop to flate or offices..


Grove Tavern Dulwich.. Pub Fire.. Insurance claim ?.. Redevelop to flate or offices..


Maismore Arms Peckham.. Pub Fire.. Insurance claim ?.. Redevelop to flate or offices..




Just Ones I know of...


DulwichFox

Great opportunity to convert into a decent foody venue that end of the lane missed. This pub isn't just a pub, it's an integral part of the cultural fabric and history of Dulwich. To lose it would bring to an end over 300 years of history on that site. Many happy family memories of this place, long before the Harvester got their hands on it. Please someone out there buy it and don't let us lose it. Genuinely brings a tear to the eye to think of us losing a great institution such as this.


Louisa.

  • 2 weeks later...

XxNikkixX Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it would make a great Toby carvary we

> certainly don't have one local and I think it

> would make great business would be very popular



I completely agree, there are no local carveries and tobys comes highly reccomended!

  • 1 month later...
It was closed for a refurbishment, but pretty sure the fire started at one of the opening parties shortly after it reopened. Someone in another thread just suggested the fire was a "fit up" job to allow for redevelopment. It didn't look anything like that on the day - there was a full on barbecue/party behind the building which set fire to the low roof at the back from memory.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • But all those examples sell a wide variety of things,  and mostly they are well spread out along Lordship Lane. These two shops both sell one very specific thing, albeit in different flavours, and are just across the road from each other. I don't think you can compare the distribution of shops in Roman times to the distribution of shops in Lordship Lane in the twenty first century. Well, you can, but it doesn't feel very appropriate. Haa anybody asked the first shop how they feel? Are they happy about the "healthy competition" ?
    • ED is included in the 17 August closure set (or just possibly 15 August, depending on which part of the page you trust more) listed at https://metro.co.uk/2025/07/25/full-list-25-poundland-stores-confirmed-close-august-23753048/. Here incidentally are some snippets from their annual reports, at https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/02495645/filing-history. 2022: " during the period we opened 41 stores and closed 43 loss-making/under-performing stores.  At the period-end we were trading from 821 stores in the UK, IoM and ROI. ... "We renogotiated 82 leases in the year, saving on average 45% versus the prior lease agreement..." 2023: "We also continued to improve our market footprint through sourcing better store locations, opening 53 and closing 51 stores during the year." 2024:  "The ex-Wilco stores acquired in the prior year have formed a core part of this strategy to expand our store network.  We favour quality over quantity and during the period we opened 84 stores and closed 71 loss-making/under-performing ones."
    • Ha! After I posted this, I thought of lots more examples. Screwfix and the hardware store? Mrs Robinson and Jumping Bean? Chemists, plant shops, hairdressers...  the list goes on... it's good to have healthy competition  Ooooh! Two cheese shops
    • You've got a point.  Thinking Leyland and Screwfix too but this felt different.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...