Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you haven't got a big enough graduated flask you could drive it off the end of a pier and see how far the water comes up the beach.


Another way might be to drive it very fast into a church and see how hot the fireball gets - it will be proportional to the kinetic energy in the system, which is itself a function of mass and velocity using the formula ? mv?. For the purposes of this calculation you could ignore the speed of the church.


If you want to keep it in one piece (you don't mention this) you could perhaps tie a stout rope around it and tie the other end to a bollard. If you knew the breaking strain of the rope (a good hardware store should be able to tell you), you could calculate how fast you had to drive around the bollard before the rope snapped. At this point you could calculate mass using the formula F = mv?/r, where F is the breaking strain of the rope, r is the length of the rope, and v is the speed you were going when it snapped.

Loz, if you assume the van was lighter than the water it displaced, then as it floated the mass of water displaced would equal the mass of the van.


If the van sank, you'd be buggered unless it was in a very deep part of the ocean where the density (and hence mass) of the water rose appreciably with depth. The van would sink until buoyancy was achieved at a particular depth (and hence density and mass).

Hallo all


Thanks for your suggestions, ideas, and insights.


Luckily, the population is not dependant upon the scientific knowledge of residents in ED.


I am going for the Local Amenity idea, then VOSPA.


I'll be back ( as Arnie Schwarzenneger said!)


Yours

R N Gutsell

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Almost right. But. actually the arcimedes principle relates to weight. I got my physics o

> level! Its not volume! Just noticed hugs explained better than me.


Weight of the water displaced, not the weight of the vehicle. As Hugo said, if the vehicle sunk (most likely) you wouldn't know it's weight.


The whole 'Eureka' story was that Archimedes knew the weight of the crown (?), but he didn't know its volume. So, he could not calculate the density and therefore decide if it was made of gold or not. But, once he stuck his fat backside in the bath...

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know a poor qulity joke regarding a suitable place to get the weight of your pet cetacean

> confirmed, but I cant be arsed.


Dunno about that joke, but I did hear about the oyster dancing rather vigorously at the disco. He pulled a mussel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...