Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you haven't got a big enough graduated flask you could drive it off the end of a pier and see how far the water comes up the beach.


Another way might be to drive it very fast into a church and see how hot the fireball gets - it will be proportional to the kinetic energy in the system, which is itself a function of mass and velocity using the formula ? mv?. For the purposes of this calculation you could ignore the speed of the church.


If you want to keep it in one piece (you don't mention this) you could perhaps tie a stout rope around it and tie the other end to a bollard. If you knew the breaking strain of the rope (a good hardware store should be able to tell you), you could calculate how fast you had to drive around the bollard before the rope snapped. At this point you could calculate mass using the formula F = mv?/r, where F is the breaking strain of the rope, r is the length of the rope, and v is the speed you were going when it snapped.

Loz, if you assume the van was lighter than the water it displaced, then as it floated the mass of water displaced would equal the mass of the van.


If the van sank, you'd be buggered unless it was in a very deep part of the ocean where the density (and hence mass) of the water rose appreciably with depth. The van would sink until buoyancy was achieved at a particular depth (and hence density and mass).

Hallo all


Thanks for your suggestions, ideas, and insights.


Luckily, the population is not dependant upon the scientific knowledge of residents in ED.


I am going for the Local Amenity idea, then VOSPA.


I'll be back ( as Arnie Schwarzenneger said!)


Yours

R N Gutsell

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Almost right. But. actually the arcimedes principle relates to weight. I got my physics o

> level! Its not volume! Just noticed hugs explained better than me.


Weight of the water displaced, not the weight of the vehicle. As Hugo said, if the vehicle sunk (most likely) you wouldn't know it's weight.


The whole 'Eureka' story was that Archimedes knew the weight of the crown (?), but he didn't know its volume. So, he could not calculate the density and therefore decide if it was made of gold or not. But, once he stuck his fat backside in the bath...

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know a poor qulity joke regarding a suitable place to get the weight of your pet cetacean

> confirmed, but I cant be arsed.


Dunno about that joke, but I did hear about the oyster dancing rather vigorously at the disco. He pulled a mussel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • How on earth can someone like this be allowed to continue as a solicitor? Can't be just be struck off, or the equivalent?
    • There are no road works in front of Cod fellas and yesterday when I requested a stop there the driver went straight past and never stopped untill Avondale Riss. As cars have to stop because of the lights why can busses not do this? 1 minute Bloodly mindedness.
    • These are the smokeless fuels you can burn on a open fireplace in Southwark: https://smokecontrol.defra.gov.uk/fuels-php/england/ https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/environment/air-quality/reduce-air-pollution/reduce-smoke
    • Thanks all, our hope was (despite the diminishing estate) he would get on with it.  Progress is glacial, it's been two years since probate was granted, that's two cold and damp winters with no heating, and not surprisingly a pipe burst. He's blames the issues on the estate agent, who separately had a dispute with him, he had a wobbly when one of the beneficiaries spoke to the estate agent.  Separately he said it was the family's fault for letting the property get into a poor condition.  It was dated, but certainly not in poor condition. There are two five star reviews on Google, and five one star: ** WARNING** This solicitor firm has to be one of the worst I have encountered. The solicitor is prehistoric in his practices and will carry out work at his own snails pace, the fax machine he uses gets turned off at 2 pm and its near impossible to get him on the phone. STAY AWAY, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, check the solicitors ombudsman, this firm has previous bad practice recorded.   Disgusting under no circumstances use this solicitor.For over 10 years he has not carried out the terms of a Will he has not re-invested money but has retained it.  He writes letters which are pure "Flannel" excuses for doing nothing.  You have been warned   shocking experience, delayed the whole process, told other side solicitors to not contact him as he feels pressured etc. never use.   Not fit for 21st century. No website, no email address, no electronic transfer. Very slow, very little communication.   Was not a pleasant experience dealing with this firm    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...