Jump to content

Recommended Posts

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this young woman in any sense qualified to be

> the BBC Economics Editor, or is she just a daddy's

> girl?


A slightly unfortunate reference given that I believe her father died when she was very young but I'm sure everyone knows what you mean. She might present a visual distraction for some but if that's the case just close your eyes and think of Engels etc (boom boom) - she's very good at economics and at communicating so the answer to your first question is, I think, yes.

Evan is quite sexy too btw and I didn't see a similar thread when he got the job.

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> And her dad helped write some great songs...


As in "I once had a whim and I had to obey it, to buy a French horn in a second hand shop".

I can sing that but need someone to play the piano - any offers ?

It is unfortunate that because Ms Flanders is a woman, an attractive woman, a young(ish) attractive woman and a young (ish) attractive woman who can communicate complex issues in an understandable way to the majority - she is therefore not qualified to be economics editor.


She is a fine young filly with a brain and the common touch. I like her and she does a good job.

  • 3 months later...

I find the original posting outrageous! Did you try to find out anything about her qualifications for the role before you assumed that as she's female and presentable she can't have got it on merit? Or does your comment have something to do with her maternity leave?


This 'young woman' is FORTY, went to Oxford and Harvard, worked as an economist at the London Business School, FT leader writer and columnist for 15 years, has worked for a number of years on Panorama, Newsnight...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The country is headed straight for a financial iceberg on 26th November. Starmer can rearrange the chairs on the deck of the Titanic, but we all know what happened. We are already ina depression which will only get deeper until one Party can turn things around, but on the current performance there is no saving us. Doom and gloom yes, but also reality kicking in.  The new Greens leader is another nut job who should be in an asylum for his own good. Starmers swift reshuffle was surprising, so lets see how things stand in 6 months to see if it made any difference. Question to ask, why did he get rid of the Leader of the House and the Scottish Secretary? What did they do wrong to be sacked? The rest of his appointments are moving people around who are already in Cabinet. Does he have no faith in what they did or didn't do?  
    • I do worry English people are focusing on “the flag” and their own wistful nostalgia (how very English) rather than what’s happening with the flag in 2025 stop analysing it as the mere national flag and have a look at it for what it is - the useful tool of intimidation by some extremely dodgy people (see also the Irish tricolour when the IRA were active) defeat the problem, then you can reclaim the flag  pretending there is no problem whilst saying “it’s just a flag” is just…. Sigh 
    • I remember when "fly the flag" was the proud slogan of British Airways  it all went pete tong when Concord was retired 😅
    • If the product states that it's not suitable for anyone under the age of 18 on the package, were you not given a warning by the brand itself? Why would any advice provided by H&B assistants override that?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...