Jump to content

Recommended Posts

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this young woman in any sense qualified to be

> the BBC Economics Editor, or is she just a daddy's

> girl?


A slightly unfortunate reference given that I believe her father died when she was very young but I'm sure everyone knows what you mean. She might present a visual distraction for some but if that's the case just close your eyes and think of Engels etc (boom boom) - she's very good at economics and at communicating so the answer to your first question is, I think, yes.

Evan is quite sexy too btw and I didn't see a similar thread when he got the job.

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> And her dad helped write some great songs...


As in "I once had a whim and I had to obey it, to buy a French horn in a second hand shop".

I can sing that but need someone to play the piano - any offers ?

It is unfortunate that because Ms Flanders is a woman, an attractive woman, a young(ish) attractive woman and a young (ish) attractive woman who can communicate complex issues in an understandable way to the majority - she is therefore not qualified to be economics editor.


She is a fine young filly with a brain and the common touch. I like her and she does a good job.

  • 3 months later...

I find the original posting outrageous! Did you try to find out anything about her qualifications for the role before you assumed that as she's female and presentable she can't have got it on merit? Or does your comment have something to do with her maternity leave?


This 'young woman' is FORTY, went to Oxford and Harvard, worked as an economist at the London Business School, FT leader writer and columnist for 15 years, has worked for a number of years on Panorama, Newsnight...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...