Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Walking along Lordship Lane today, including side streets, I encountered five instances of pairs of electric Lime Bikes left in the middle of the pavement blocking it. Just not acceptable.


Over the summer I have seen more of these bikes left lying around, blocking pavements. What is going on and why do bike users think this is okay?

Also the jumble of e scooters left outside superdrug which often extends well into the middle of the pavement creating a trip hazard for pedestrians and an obstruction for wheelchair users and push-chairs. When the pavement was widened a few years ago, the reason was to make things easier for pedestrians but now the situation is far worse.
These bikes are very heavy and not at all easy to move. They shouldn't be there in the first place full stop. It's nothing else but producing and scattering more rubbish around - and taking space from pedestrians. One was left in front of the Guy's hospital recently, right in the middle of a pavement; a patient tripped over, thankfully nothing happened.

Certainly there are renters who are being thoughtless and leaving them in stupid places. However at least some of them (particularly the ones in pairs or groups?) have been dropped off there by Lime's own drivers after repair/ recharge/ redistribution. I came across a cluster of about 8 bikes and a scooter that had appeared overnight - dumped on a narrow pavement at a zebra crossing. Wankers!


It shouldn't be necessary to fix other people's failures (I have plenty of my own) but I do try to take 30 seconds to move them if I see one that's blocking something. They are quite heavy. The rear wheel is locked so the easiest way to move them is to lift the rear off the ground slightly and roll them out the way on the front wheel.

It just seems so incredibly thoughtless and frankly stupid, more akin to the actions of young children, especially the bikes and scooters that are left lying in the middle of paths. Unless it is actually mostly kids doing it?


The state of the pavement outside Superdrug today was something else too. It is starting to look a right old mess.

Sorry, DKHB, missed your comment that possibly Lime employees are responsible for some of the random pavement bike dumpings? If that is so, I'd hope the Council takes note and does something about it. A wheelchair user or even someone with limited mobility could be severely affected.

Also the jumble of e scooters left outside superdrug which often extends well into the middle of the pavement creating a trip hazard for pedestrians and an obstruction for wheelchair users and push-chairs. When the pavement was widened a few years ago, the reason was to make things easier for pedestrians but now the situation is far worse.

 

I too was appalled by the amount of escooters scattered in the above location.

If someone was partially sighted they could easily take a tumble over them.

It also narrows the pavement at a busy junction.

And let us not forget these scooters are also sometimes used by street robbers.

I beg to differ. Sections of public space in key areas have been put at the disposal of this company and their users. I'd think it perfectly reasonable for our councillors to liaise with the organisation on our behalf and that sort of intervention is likely to be a good deal more effective too.

1) a user has to complete a short briefing in the app before they can hire a bike or scooter. The app tells them they must not leave the bike or scooter somewhere that blocks pavements or inconveniences others. It's not rocket science anyway


2) when you complete a rental, you are prompted to take a photo in the app of where you have left the item to prove it is not blocking anything. I don't know whether anyone ever looks at the photos to check


3) it is not easy to report badly parked vehicles through Lime's website or app. You have to complete a multifield form. Contrast that with how easy it is to rent an item - you just scan its bar code.


4) in theory the scooters should be less problematic than the bikes, as the scooters can ONLY be left in the little parking bays (otherwise the operators fines the user). In practice...one other thing to note is that the scooter bays are mostly on the pavements instead of on the roads (where perhaps they should be) because that would mean "losing" a car parking space (which is perhaps what should happen).


5) the solution to this is for the council to start fining Lime or confiscating the bikes. This will give Lime the incentive it needs to ensure its users are not parking stupidly. If you park a Zip Car vehicle on the pavement, the council tickets Zip Car, and Zip Car forwards the ticket (and a chunky admin fee) to the user.

DKHB, completely agree and hoping Councillors see this thread and think about drawing a line in the sand, before it gets out of control. It absolutely should be the council who sort this with the relevant organisations.
Agree re the difficulty of reporting - not so much because it's a multifield form but because I have to give them my personal data, which I don't want to do. There are two parked at varying angles across the footpath in my road this morning, about 20 metres from each other.

The place where Lime has been allowed to leave their scooters is totally unacceptable.


I also seen a Lime bike dumped on the Lordship Lane Estate on the footpath outside Bew Court. Then again Zip Cars have also been left on the estate previously.

DKHB, completely agree and hoping Councillors see this thread and think about drawing a line in the sand, before it gets out of control. It absolutely should be the council who sort this with the relevant organisations.

 

I don't think you can just post on here and hope that a councillor sees it and hope that they do something about it. With the best will in the world, "someone online said they saw one dumped somewhere at some point" isn't really much to go on...


If you want it fixed - and it's no guarantee - take a photo, email it to the council CC your councillor, and demand it is fixed.

May be related - I got a general email from Lime (I regularly use their bikes in the centre of town to get around, not used them in SE22 but they obviously know I live here!) earlier this week with a warning/reminder about parking bikes so they don't obstruct pavements, the issues it causes for the elderly and less able and it showed a map of SE22 and surrounds on the email. Sure it's auto-generated but thought that was interesting

Ban people? Some folk are responsible and others aren’t. Best thing you can do is move a badly placed bike or scooter to a safer place.

 

Or take a photo and send it to LIME or Southwark Council. Where there's blame there's a claim.

The answer is to provide marked, on street parking bays for them, as they do in Camden.


There are none for the hire bikes and the scooter bays are for some reason on the pavement, not the road.


Every street should have one or two parking spaces on the street marked out for hire bikes.

Unfortunately this is a problem every where e-scooters are promoted as a means of active travel. I was in Munich some years ago and the locals were complaining about the growing problem of dumped e-scooters.


And remember the council is actively promoting, and making money from, these trials so they want to see more providers and hence more scooters blocking our pavements until they select the winner. When is the winner due to be selected? In the meantime the e-scooter providers will be carpet bombing more of their product onto the streets.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...