Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No-one can ever give me a immediate answer at Southwark. Are there parents that reject places and NEVER get another place anywhere? Can this happen? Everyone seems to be avoiding giving me an answer to that query.


Just emailed southwark for my wait times again, emailing fortnightly for updates. Pinning hopes on Bessemer as we are just within the top 15 there. Our other wait times look like Horniman 35, Goodrich 40, Eliot Bank 50, Heber 65, Fairlawn 79 and no figure for DV due to them updating but 51 there the last I knew.


How is everyone else in the grey area getting on?


Think I will be calling Bessemer today to try and get a feel for if/when/how quickly we can get in there with our position.. Got to be some hope

We seem to be slowly edging away from a place in Goodrich. I am trying to get clarification from the admissions team to whether those children who are going down the independent route and have rejected a place are now being reflected in the waiting lists.
Just to add something re: Judith Kerr, for the parents asking about movement on waiting lists, the site of the school still hasn't been announced, so there are probably a lot of reception places hanging in the balance at the moment (50, plus some year one and two). That could add up to a lot of late rejections of places in other schools in the coming months. As I said in another post, not really the parents' faults (and not really JKP's either - they're still embargoed re. disclosure of the location), but this is something to be aware of.

Hi Gina, you have no guarantee of a place being offered to you from a waiting list. You can go up or down or stay in the same position on the waiting list.


Ryekids, yes people who have rejected a place due to an alternative eg independent place, would have already impacted on the waiting list. If families move into the area and live closer than you, or take up places at the school for older siblings or get re-characterised under Social/medical need, this will cause you to drop down the waiting list.


If you have been allocated a school that is too far from you, please add your name to the lists of other schools in the area. If you get a place at another school that you didn't originally apply to, you still remain on the waiting list of those you initially applied to.

Renata

At the moment parents of children with offers to Judith Kerr would be very silly not to hang onto other school places offered. Different area, different school, but International Academy of Greenwich announced last week they are deferring opening their new free school, problems with the site apparently...

http://www.iaog.org.uk/blog/announcement-opening-deferred-until-september-2014

Re ate, as I understood it people, who are going down the independent route are under no obligation at all to officially decline their offer so those with places outside the central system can still hold onto places at community schools for as long as they please. Is that not the case then?
I have a friend who has accepted a place at Langbourne and is very happy with her choice. If you are focused on results, then perhaps not the school for you - but a new head, great facilities and look at all those clubs - it's even got a chess club! My advice would be to go and visit and canvas some opinions for parents with children already at the school rather than listening to some contributors to the forum who have probably never set foot inside the school gates......we were in a similar situation a few years ago when we accepted a place at Goose Green so I know what a bunch of willing parents and a new head can do to improve a school. And I also know that being part of that change is the most uplifting experience I have ever had! Just a thought.

I'd agree not to write Langbourne off. My eldest started school (goodrich)in 2009, when there were lots of very disappointed parents, even after the first bulge classes were decided 3 weeks before the start of term. Everything being said about Langbourne now was being said about Bessemer and Goose Green then, and I know a lot of parents were in tears. None of us had even heard of Bessemer until the allocations were made! Both are now among the best schools in the area.


With a new head, new investment in buildings and a new influx of commited East Dulwich parents, I fully expect people to be fighting to get into Langbourne in a few years.

Hi Number 2, yes parents can and sometimes do hold onto school places until September. It is not uncommon for eg 2 children not to turn up for start of primary.


Re Goosemum's post- to add, parents of 4year olds should remember that it will be 7 years before their child sits SATs!


Renata

Hi kamath,

Not sure what you mean?


Hi Renata,

I thought children will going forward be assessed against stages before 11yo. Year 2 KS2 teachers will assess work. Will be interesting to see if schools make the oversall data freely available rather than relying upon 7 years of faith from families.

James, it's a type of learning (http://www.forestschools.com/what-happens-at-a-forest-school/) - becoming more popular, but unusual to see in city schools - unsurprisingly. It's a great thing for them to offer (I know nothing about the school, just hoping to inform about this...)
Horniman Primary also run Forest Schools on site. The kids go and do lessons outside (rain or shine!) and make fires/toast marshmallows/have hot chocolate once a week. They also go on trips to other local woods too e.g. Sydenham for lessons/treasure hunts.

I agree with above posters, Forest School scheme sounds fantastic!


Hi James, KS1 assessments used to be formal, papers sent off etc until a few years ago. Now they are done as teacher assessments, results are however collated. Yes, children are continuously assessed so parents can see the progress of their child from year to year. With the high turnover of pupils in London primaries, I'm not sure how accurate a comparison of a group of 6-7 year olds with a group of 10-11 year old 30-40% of whom may be different children! The KS2 SATs for year 6s (age 10/11) are still held simultaneously in all schools and papers marked externally (they were Monday to Thursday last week).


Renata

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...