Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> On a serious note: TED you are a frikkin moron,

> with either hammer i'd happily nail your door

> shut, keeping you out of reach of any comms

> devices.

> http://s7g3.scene7.com/is/image/ae235?$p$&layer=0&

> size=281,281&layer=1&size=281,281&src=ae235/41235_

> P


Netty, trust me, you'd feel so much better doing it with a sexy looking, over priced, state-of-the-art 'nail gun'...


http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110921022903/fallout/images/thumb/1/15/Shoulder_mounted_machine_gun.png/240px-Shoulder_mounted_machine_gun.png

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you still banned from the sane bits of the

> Forum?


Yeaah - Ha ha ha ha ha hahhhhhaaaaa


AND I'm locked in the same room as you


*helplessly claws at the glass*

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah and I run 5TB Databases (not sure what your

> job has to do with it ) each one on 40 spindles


Yarrr never mind hammers - spindles is sexy as-


http://www.chanterbiomed.co.uk/boiler_spares/images/Spindles.gif

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bobster - no, not suggesting anyone should do

> anything. Just saying that the average person who

> buys a mac does so because they're happy to pay a

> premium for something they think looks cool. This

> is hardly a crime, of course. It's just seems

> rather daft.


Not everyone buys them because they think they look cool.


Some of us are just stupid don'tknowanybetters or rather, not very tech-savvy and quite like having a machine that tells us exactly what to do and when eg "click on this button now, yes THIS one, to update virus software" as opposed to a "go to settings, install this, uninstall that, run this" assuming you know what you're doing then when it realises you don't, "RTFM you moron" scenario.


I'm sure if I knew anything about computers, I may well dislike using a mac or spending more money on one to do same things I can do for less.

Bah and Humbug!! Buy an Apple product and you are buying into a closed eco-system. Compatibility with any non-apple products, hardware or software will prove to be a major headache (install itunes on a PC and see the mess).

Sure they look good and are of great quality, robust and reliable. But cost a fortune!

Apple have built in restraints to prevent home upgrades, the internals are nothing special and again restricted at OS/X level, force you into upgrading early on in the machines life, To gain any rewards from using any of their products hassle free you end up buying them all! Disgusting company IMHO who in their right mind likes spending a monkey to buy a dog?

I think the point is that it takes all your MP3s and converts them to the itunes format, thus taking up a load more disk space with duplicate media. They could have just played MP3s and shared.


I hate itunes. Deleted it a couple of years ago, but have now reinstalled for use with ipod, but that is the only reason I use it. Just find it somehow non user friendly.

Itunes is like the puffer fish of the 'puter world- its seems to sorta expand, spending its entire life updating itself and hogging whatever mmemory you have to spare. I hate Itunz with a passion for this reason alone.


fair enough if you actually use Macs n ting for a specific purpose, where it probabaly excels - I can cope with that, but given that 95% of the population use a puter to surf the net and visit a maximum of 10 sites in an average month, of which only about 3 or 4 are actually regular visits, its a bit wanky to buy a mac for this.Its like buying a rolex seadweller to go for a bit of rafts and rascals action in dulwich pool on sundays.

I actually get on quite well with itunes these days, though it has taken a while to get it's act together, at least as far as PCs are concerned.


It doesn't convert anything, indeed it has mp3 codecs if that's what you want to rip to.


It no worse a performer than some of the alternatives, half of which seem to be clones, and significantly better than say Sony's offering.


Mind you they're all becoming marketing portals and I really just want organisation software so may take the leap to Media Monkey or suchlike eventually. WHatever is compatible with ALAC (doh!!) and [probably] Sonos in the new house.

I did silly amounts of research at Xmas and found problems with every bally tablet - particularly as they want to snare you into their traps. I consider Apple as virtually a closed market, both in terms of competition and the controls on the retail price. Post above echoes some of this. Selling at a higher cost (and Kindle as well) to the Eurpean market smacks of hypocracy from the land of free trade (Harley Davison are only in business due to the money the State pumped into them and punative taxation on large imported motorbikes back in the day). Something good to be said about the EU in a level playing field.



Some of the more informative reviews on Amazon were helpful. I ended up buying the family an Ipad and managed to squeeze a few quid out of the Apple store in convincing them that I could get a discount (bally hard work). Mind you the ipod thingy does all the stuff the iphone seems to do apart from calls and texts at a third of the cost.


People cross the road when they see my three year old non smart mobile phone to avoid the embarassment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...