Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't do fat.

>

>

> You've got to read between the lines though, Mick.

>

>

> In online dating parlance, 'fat' is usually

> described as 'average build'



Nah.


Curvy = fat

Bubbly = fat

Vivacious = fat

Fun-loving = fat

Dopamine1979 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is brutal.


xxxxxx


Brutal but true.


I can guarantee that my idea of fun and my SOH will not be the same as those of anybody describing themselves as either fun-loving or having a GSOH :))


ETA: It's the dating equivalent of those places which describe the stuff they sell as "stylish" :))

Not tried it, but I imagine speed dating is the most efficient form of dating.


A minute or two is probably all you need with anyone - to make a decision as to whether to take it any further.



Unfortunately (so I'm told) it's also the one the attracts the highest proportion of 'not with a bargepoles'.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the key to internet dating - initally

> anyway - is just not to say anything weird. Just

> go with something regular and standard which won't

> put anyone off.

>


xxxxxx


Yeh but the weird ones have cottoned onto that.


You don't find out they're weird till later.


Apart from the one who thought it was a good dating ploy to send me a link to a website dedicated to his dead wife.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So can any of you experts write the perfect ad

> to

> > attract a male?

>

> Are you struggling with attracting a male Declan.

>

>

> Have you tried the Castle.


No Mad Mick I'm not even trying. Even flies give me a wide berth!

With there being so many 'experts' on internet dating posting I was wondering what exactly a female could write to attract the males on here who see most things as meaning something else?

I met my partner via online dating 8 years ago and still going strong :) When I was last single I was urged by 20/30-somethings at work to try online dating as that was considered 'the norm' by them. Tried it for a few months, met some very interesting peeps, had some quite frankly hilarious dates, and finally met R.


The trick (I feel) is to not take online dating uber seriously, to have some fun, to have a decent 'get out' strategy (always meet for coffee or drinks on first meeting, never a meal) and to keep an open mind. Many online daters are far to strict with their requirements....


'female 36 - wants to meet solvent, tall, dark handsome man with own hair, house and car. Must adore cats and no beards/moustaches.'


'male late 40s - wants to meet green eyed oriental lady 18-29. Must be under size 10 and large bossomed.'

woodrot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I found that using key words like miserable,

> scowly ethic scotch bastard attracted rather more

> replies than anticipated oddly enough


xxxxxxx


That's because they thought you genuinely had a GSOH rather than that you were being honest :))

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > > In online dating parlance, 'fat' is usually

> described as 'average build'

> >

> > Nah.

> >

> > Curvy = fat

> > Bubbly = fat

> > Vivacious = fat

> > Fun-loving = fat

>

> Great personality = fat and ugly



harsh... very harsh

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • She also suggested that the 2017 Manchester terror attack (perpetrated by an Islamist extremist) was due to "divisiveness" and tried to pin the blame on the far right. Grim, really. 
    • Thankfully, it seems that yesterday's "Red vs Blue" school wars thing has turned out to be a hoax/ nonsense/ whatever. (See link below if you managed to avoid this stuff). In years to come, we might found out who - or which countries - has an interest in testing what happens when you post socially disruptive content online about fake events... In the meantime, thank you to our local teachers and other school workers, police community support officers and police officers. My commute happens to take me past a bunch of schools at dropoff/pickup times, and I noticed a much greater and more visible presence on streets outside/near schools than normal. Annoying as it must have been to be distracted from other important duties, I really value and appreciate them looking out for the kids. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/school-wars-trend-red-blue-london-police-latest-142328025.html https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jan/01/birmingham-new-year-fireworks-display-centenary-square-police  
    • Hi Eleanor, I run the Just Dance Fit classes mentioned above. It would be lovely to have you there. I’m at the dance studio at Harris Girls’ Academy on Homestall Road throughout the year every Monday, Wednesday and Sunday: Mondays 6:30-7:30pm - Just Dance Fit Mondays 7:30-8:30pm - Flowetic Wednesdays 6:30-7:30pm - Flowetic Sundays 10:30-11:30am - Flowetic Lots of information and booking via the website: www.justdanceuk.com but if you have any questions don’t hesitate to drop me a line at 07522 231 446 or [email protected]. Hope this helps! Fiona =)
    • a) Because they published a leaflet in Urdu promising to give "Muslims a strong voice". This is reprehensible - just as a party that promised to give Protestants or Jews or Buddhists alone "a strong voice" would be acting in a sectarian manner. Parties - especially socialist ones like the English & Welsh Greens are now - should not be assymetrically promoting the interests of one religious group. b) Because they published a video in Urdu and Bangla criticising Kier Starmer for meeting Narendra Modi, when Modi has nothing to do with the issues discussed. Modi is a Hindu nationalist bigot - but in this context, the Greens are just shitstirring existing tensions between British Hindus and British Muslims for the purpose of trying to win Muslim votes - see the first point. FWIW I don't have any problem with parties communicating with the electorate in languages other than English (from Irish to Polish to Malayalam). What is very suspicious is when parties pump out sectarian messages only in one language... When Mamdani ran for Mayor of NYC (and won) he released plenty of campaign videos in multiple languages - but always with English subtitles too. There was never a suggestion he was sending different, sectarian messages to different groups.     https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-greens-made-advert-urdu-164616073.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/uk-green-party-accused-of-sectarianism-after-releasing-videos-in-urdu-and-bangla-featuring-pm-modi-and-gaza/articleshow/128826689.cms  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...