Jump to content

Recommended Posts

pecknam has been chock full of artists for a long long time- one of the issues with the proposed siting of the tram sidings in SE15 all those years ago was that it would uproot an established art community ( amongst other fings blates). Louisa has a solid point - its not the artists who are the problem, its the leeches that feed on genuine creativity that distort the demographic. shitty galleries, overpriced coffee shops and bespoke third reich grocers arrive to supply the arriviste lice needs. pretty soon, the artists jump ship to somewhere more affordable, leaving the area populous, wealthier but a genuine cultural desert, brimming with scummer parasite needy facile media savvy hangers on and their ilk.Like vultures arrivng to feast on rotting carcasses.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> She doesn't have a point- all of those areas are

> completely socially mixed- all have 'working' and

> 'middle' class enclaves.



s'true - but the divisions in those areas are more marked than ever- at least there is a degree of interaction in teh bellend road/ South peckham area at the minute.

It's all moot anyway- this is how London develops and shifts, and will continue to do so. Art students will populate cheaper areas within reach of art colleges (Camberwell, Goldsmiths etc), the areas will start to become interesting, middle classes and money will follow.


Should the working 'classes' have areas that no other 'classes' are allowed to move to? Working class ghettos? Now there's an idea.

ah bollocks.

If there was a tribal identification with neighbourhood then there'd be no gentrification.


No one is being cleansed, they're cashing in and buying nic big properties in on the Medway and the Thames estuary.


Same with the facile arguments about village invasions in [lots of nice places around britain]


Don't torch the house of the person who bought it; beat up your mate who sold it for a big fat profit and moved out of his crumbling ancestral home to a jolly nice little 2 up 2 down in Swindon and finally got a proper job.


I'm getting a bit sick of hearing it, change the fecking record Lousia, just 'cos all your mates abandoned you, don't blame the blow-ins.

Those saying this is how London develops are way off base. London is the most socially mixed major city I've ever been in. The policy that every area has to have social housing ensures that not even the poshest parts of London become anything like Paris. Nottinghill's housing stock for example is still 38% socially rented-- http://www.mouseprice.com/area-guide/housing-stock/w11


Areas change in London without the total cleansing you see in other big cities. This is one of the most admirable things about the city.


Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyDeliah, I'm not blaming artists for social

> apartheid, far from it. I'm suggesting that this

> process of regeneration followed by an art

> movement followed by inflated property prices is

> what always happens when gentrification has taken

> hold. It's a process which has been seen in

> Notting Hill, Islington, Hackney, Clapham,

> Battersea, Chelsea, more recently Shoreditch and

> Hoxton. All solidly working class neighbourhoods

> which have been 'gentrified' and are now not

> socially mixed any longer and unaffordable to

> large numbers of people.

>

> Louisa.

I'm with LM. I recommend a series of books called 'The Making of Modern London' for a true understanding of how London has formed, with it's suburbs and social mix of enclaves door to door. The excellent series 'The Secret History of our Streets' also demonstrated the demographic phases that areas go though.


In London, the overwhelming reason for gentrification in the last three decades has been the desire to find lower property prices (I'll stop short of saying affordable). Artists and the art movement have played no major role in that process. Deregulation of mortgage restrictions and cheap credit have been the major factor there.


Louisa you should know better than anyone that Rye Lane was once the second Regent Street of London, aimed exactly at the kind of people and money that you are now complaining about 'taking over'. The older architecture alone on the neighbouring streets also is a clue that the area was born as a middle class suburb. You have also complained before about the multi-ethnic make up and the cultural diversity of Rye Lane. So now you don't want middle-class people of a certain ilk there too? Well just who do you want there and what kind of economy do you expect them to drive?

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa you should know better than anyone that Rye

> Lane was once the second Regent Street of London,

> aimed exactly at the kind of people and money that

> you are now complaining about 'taking over'. The

> older architecture alone on the neighbouring

> streets also is a clue that the area was born as a

> middle class suburb. You have also complained

> before about the multi-ethnic make up and the

> cultural diversity of Rye Lane. So now you don't

> want middle-class people of a certain ilk there

> too? Well just who do you want there and what kind

> of economy do you expect them to drive?


So true. Personally I find it very sad that Rye Lane has lost all the wonderful shops that it used to have (which posters have listed on this forum in other threads). I'd like to see it going up in the world again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...