Jump to content

The Mag


Recommended Posts

Not sure if it's related to The Patch, but between four and six weeks ago there was a sign up in the window saying that the landlord (Enterprise Inns) had taken the property back from the tenant and they were not permitted to enter. Within a few days there was activity inside getting ready to reopen it, with whom I assume is now managing it.


This was around the same time The Patch kickstarter project was coming to an end and hadn't met it's funding target, but purely speculation on my part as to whether it was actually The Patch it was being taken back from.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the Patch need to restate and clarify their

> intentions about when they take over because

> turning people's impressions around at this point

> is going to be a struggle


xxxxxx


See here - yet another forum thread started by Arnold:


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1094207,1094207#msg-1094207


But nothing posted on their Facebook page for over a month:


https://www.facebook.com/dulwichpatch


And nothing much on Twitter either:




The Patch have been "about to take over The Mag" since before Christmas, so who knows what is going on behind the scenes.


The notice on The Mag referred to above was when Steve, the previous manager, left. I can't imagine Tony, the present (temporary) manager can keep the pub going for much longer, as it appears to be spiralling downhill fast at the moment.


Whatever is the opposite of finger on the pulse of East Dulwich, is how the Mag is being run at present ..... in my opinion.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I did see that Sue. A month ago....

>

> It's in that month that people are looking at the

> pub and writing it off. In the meantime no updates

> on here from Patch & Co. No updates on their

> facebook page either

>

> People will draw their own conclusions


xxxxxx


I do completely agree, but Arnold did say at the end of that last post


"won?t be posting further on the ED forum until we have a launch date."


What I can't understand is the constant stating - with great certainty - that the lease is about to be signed. My OH and I were first told this by Arnold before Christmas, and he has said it on the forum at various times in the five or so months since then.


And press articles have appeared which portray The Patch as already being in existence .....


I understand that these things take time, but why keep jumping the gun when there is nothing definite to report? There's a loss of credibility when such statements are made over and over again and then nothing happens.


Let's hope that loss of credibility can be overcome if and when The Patch actually opens.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah! I do. Very hit and miss. Do you remember the

> discoteque type back bar back in the 70s? That was

> pretty wild.


Yep.. DJ in Middle of floor.. All done up like a cave...Chicken Wire and plaster..


Foxy

The comedy at the Mag was brilliant. It had been at the EDT before. Both pubs threw the comedy out so they could 'develop the room' to the detriment of all. Now the comedy is at The Hob, opposite Forest Hill station, run by hard working amazing Emma and Ron who had to buy the pub to make sure their comedy club had a secure longlasting home. Patronise the Hob, it's only just a bit further up the road and give these exploitative Enterprise establishments a miss!

UncleBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I remember when the family that run the Cherry

> Tree/Vale had the Mag for a while. .

> Maybe the Mag, just like the Cherry Tree is just

> 100 yards too far from the 'main drag' of LL ever

> to be as busy as the other LL pubs?


xxxxx


Really? The Cherry Tree people owned the Mag? When was that?


The Cherry Tree has (or could have, other things being equal which they aren't) a massive advantage over The Mag because it's just down from East Dulwich Station.


Would be a great drinking place for people on their way home from work.


It's also not as far from the "main drag" as The Mag is, I think. It's only a two minute walk from Goose Green roundabout and the EDT, whereas the Mag is in the middle of nowhere.


The Cherry Tree was beginning to do very well for a while under fresh new management and a good young chef, and was making a name for itself with excellent food and ales and pulling in a lot of custom until .... well, you know what happened I presume.


All downhill from there :(


Both the Mag and the Cherry Tree have got a long way to go to haul themselves up by their bootstraps, they have both sunk so low now :(

The Magdela was the place to be in the early 80s. The DJ sat in a squared off area in the middle of the pub, playing everybodys favourite songs and sisters and friends had a great time. Trying to get a coke (or drink) at the bar was hard work as it was literally shoulder to shoulder.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> UncleBen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> Really? The Cherry Tree people owned the Mag? When

> was that?

X x x x x x

Yes, short term lease. They also had short term lease on EDT before that. They ran the Tyrell Arms for years. They've been in pub trade for a long time.

I didn't like the new management of Cherry Tree as it became yet another cloned ED pub for the Stepford husbands.

The Mag isn't in the middle of nowhere. There are pubs further up the drag that do much better than the Mag. And TGE has also shown that you don't need even need to be on LL to be successful. They are going to have to find something interesting that sets them apart but there is no reason why the location should hold them back.
For what it is worth I think it is a great location as it is away from the main drag. There is a bar in Chiswick called the Roebuck that is almost identical in layout and very popular albeit expensive but where isn't now. It is also one of the lasts pubs on the main High Road drag. To get the Mag up to that sort of standard would require hefty investment.
there was a thai restaurant upstairs at one time, a film club used to meet and show films there courtesy of Reg Buckley - Mag. owner, who played a "John Cleese lookalike" soldier escorting Jesus with cross to Sainsburys carpark to be crucified "report South London Press",there was a Stargate Club upstairs - very scary people. It was also "drug central" in SE London, held Rock Nights, hosted a(real) gangsters wedding-no names, had firework parties for local/not local kids, charity auctions and events, like the worst underwear streak, the bucket of water fight etc., great times, great people (of their time) sadly gone, and much as I disagreed with James on his description of regulars and locals, there was a comradeship, not just in this pub but between the pubs and customers up and down Lordship Lane, that will not be found again in Dulwich (judging by such comments as his) it is time to move on.
  • 2 weeks later...

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Funeral Parlour..

>

> Would get more people through the door.

>

> Just walked passed.. Doors open. No one inside.

> Not even staff.

>

> Not sure if they were open..

>


xxxxxx


Not sure there will be many people in any local pubs at 5pm on a Wednesday, Fox?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...