Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?d make one ugly Brenda


Good of you to admit it, B.

But truth be told I suppose we all would with an injudicious amount of alcohol in us.

But perhaps 'ugly' is a somewhat harsh word. Let's say 'alternatively attractive'.

There.

jumpinjackflash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It should be the law that no one (especially

> fellas) should wear flipflops if their second toe

> is longer than their big toe!



nonsense. It is a well known fact that as well as being attractive longer second toes mean a genetic disposition towards telepathy.

We superior beings have no problem with you run of the mill short second toers gallivanting around ED in your sandals. Just know that if you see a longer second toe, you are in the presence of greatness.

Marilyn Monroe, JFK, Cleopatra, Shakespeare and Ghandi are but a few of our number.

I tend to go for longish (but not 3 quarter length) shorts, and t-shirts, usually with sandals, sometimes with trainers (and trainer socks). I'm a real t-shirt guy anyway, so that doesn't really change all year unless it's really really cold. I wore jumpers for about a week in the winter.


I can't stand the whole blokes say topless outside the pub thing, it just puts me off my beer!

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I can't stand the whole blokes say topless outside

> the pub thing, it just puts me off my beer!



Wouldn?t mind so much if the ladies did it though.


I?ve never got the whole stripping to the waste thing either though. Not unless you?re on a beach or maybe in a park or something like that. It?s just doesn?t go well with the scenery in a city like London.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As a bloke I would beg to differ Brendan. I think

> my dress sense is pretty excellent. Ok, I admit

> it, I am gay. However you do see some pretty fine

> looking metrosexuals around these parts.

>

> PS I wouldn't make a bad Jane either


Well, I mean that's just cheating isn't it?

You start from a much higher taste line than us lumpy ol' heteros.

You wouldn't make a bad Jane? I'd make any old kind of Jane, I wouldn't even insist on her calling me Tarzan.

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This week I have mostly been wearing...

>

> my "Sheffield United" beach shorts and clashing,

> non-Hawaiian, short sleeved cotton shirts...


Can every gay MBer please avert their eyes. I'm sorry you had to see that.

I'm sorry I had to see it, though I think I might've.

Can?t say I have ever felt the need to shave my legs but I have some friends who are into cycling and do so (why escapes me) and they go by the mantra; ?Shaving?s for pussies. Real men wax.?


So there you go.


Oh and Mrs B. re the fake tan. Any man who wears fake tan will have the piss ripped out of him buy his mates for years to come. It may even earn him a new nickname. I?d say go for it just for the entertainment value.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...