Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For large chunks of our journies, we effectively already do.


And what with the remote flying technologies already in use by the military seguing into civilian use, no reason why an airline can't just have a call centre with ten pilot for the entire fleet to take over when things get tricky.


Only a matter of time...

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For large chunks of our journies, we effectively

> already do.

>

> And what with the remote flying technologies

> already in use by the military seguing into

> civilian use, no reason why an airline can't just

> have a call centre with ten pilot for the entire

> fleet to take over when things get tricky.

>

> Only a matter of time...



Welcome on board Drone flight 001.

No doubt it is, as people say, ?coming? ? but pointing out that it?s pilotless for most of the time already isn?t that relevant


Pilots are there for when the instruments go wrong ? and that is something I can?t see changing too quickly


All those news stories about a pilot crash landing a plane into a field ? are they going to be replaced by


?the amazing Oric 1 automated pilot froze completely so the automated copilot Dragon 32 patched in, took one look at things and said ?logically, we?re screwed here people?, and gave up?


That first crash on a pilotless flight, and the follow up investigation is going to be intense

Everyone being scientific (nerdy), just have faith in the market. People won't like the idea, for a plane worth several hundred million and the good name of your company/brand having a qualified pilot (heck even 2) on standby at say ?500 a pop on a trans-atlantic flight is a no brainer investment even if they do SFA


...which is kind of EP's point

I'd be happy to fly in one. About half of all plane crashes are down to pilot error, the single biggest cause. When push comes to shove a pilot is only an organic computer, slower, less reliable and more prone to error than an inorganic one, and for all you know has just found out the copilot is having an affair with his wife.

nashoi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd be happy to fly in one. About half of all

> plane crashes are down to pilot error, the single

> biggest cause. When push comes to shove a pilot is

> only an organic computer, slower, less reliable

> and more prone to error than an inorganic one, and

> for all you know has just found out the copilot is

> having an affair with his wife.


Nashoi


You are the EDF's Mr Spock

The pilotless plane doesn't really interest me much - technically we're almost there anyway. And as quids says, it's not really going to save any money for the airlines, so where's the incentive?


What really does interest me is the steward-less plane. Automated food and booze vending direct to every seat. Or maybe a giant sushi-style conveyor belt going around the plane, carrying various items of food and drink. Could also be used to collect rubbish, and distribute landing cards and sick bags.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "In case of an emergency raise arms in air and

> scream until your pulped body is consumed in a

> conflagration of twisted metal and kerosene"



♫♫♪♪♫♫♪♫♫♪♪♫♫♫♪♪♪♫♫ Come fly with me, let's die, let's fly away ♫♫♪♪♫♫♪♫♫♪♪♫♫♫♪♪♪♫♫

> I'd be happy to fly in one. About half of all

> plane crashes are down to pilot error, the single

> biggest cause.


So about half are down to mechanical. Let's just say that's right.


The US Navy just launched an UA fighter jet. And if you look at their track record relating to the most common UA - the drones, it sure doesn't do anything for my confidence in unmanned aircraft. Take the drone attacks in Pakistan as an example, less than 2% hit their targets. Hence either the human remote programming and control is out of whack or there's a mechanical problem. In any event I'm glad I wont be on any US aircraft carrier when one of these jets misses it's target and goes careering.

We would like to Welcome you aboard this flight to New York..


This Plane is Pilotless and is being controlled and flown entirely by our onboard computers.


We would like to re-assure passengers that there is absolutely nothing that can go wrong ...


go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...


Foxy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Have you complained to the solicitor directly and did they respond within the 8 weeks they have under their code of conduct - I presume they have and this is why you have escalated further to the SRA? If he doesn't respond in a timely fashion per the SRA code of conduct then I am sure they will need to take action.
    • What a bunch of ignorant nimbies.  Their own tweet conspicuously ignores the actual content of their own article FFS. Immediately after the incorrect paragraph quoted about it being unlawful to burn coal wood etc they sit out the actual position:   "However, the use of authorised smokeless fuels in an open fireplace is allowed, as well as burning smoke-generating fuels in an approved stove or burner."   leaving that out is as thick as flying into the amazon rainforest on a private jet to attend Cop 31 thus week.
    • I had to pull this cat back from speeding traffic as she was almost clipped - TWICE -  by passing motorbikes on Underhill Rd. Needless to say, I was seething that anyone would let this cat out onto the streets, specially a street that I struggle to cross myself. When I initially approached her, I thought she had already been injured. By some miracle, she wasn't, she was just paralyzed by fear. Do NOT let this cat out onto the streets. Microchip: 933082600574914
    • Are there any other executors? Is the solicitor a soke practioner or part of a firm? Are you and your fellow beneficiaries behaving well?  You will want to take proper  legal advice (which this is not) but you can have an executor removed by the court if they are refusing to communicate with you. I would just do that. Tell him you are doing it, tell him you have reported him to the Law Society (if you have) and tell him you will be challenging his fees with the legal services ombudsman. This all sounds outrageous to me and this solicitor doesn't sound fit to practice. Three years sounds far too long for a low value estate comprising mostly of a house. He should have sold that or rented it out whilst he was waiting to administer the estate.    Sounds like he has cost you all a lot of money.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...