Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For large chunks of our journies, we effectively already do.


And what with the remote flying technologies already in use by the military seguing into civilian use, no reason why an airline can't just have a call centre with ten pilot for the entire fleet to take over when things get tricky.


Only a matter of time...

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For large chunks of our journies, we effectively

> already do.

>

> And what with the remote flying technologies

> already in use by the military seguing into

> civilian use, no reason why an airline can't just

> have a call centre with ten pilot for the entire

> fleet to take over when things get tricky.

>

> Only a matter of time...



Welcome on board Drone flight 001.

No doubt it is, as people say, ?coming? ? but pointing out that it?s pilotless for most of the time already isn?t that relevant


Pilots are there for when the instruments go wrong ? and that is something I can?t see changing too quickly


All those news stories about a pilot crash landing a plane into a field ? are they going to be replaced by


?the amazing Oric 1 automated pilot froze completely so the automated copilot Dragon 32 patched in, took one look at things and said ?logically, we?re screwed here people?, and gave up?


That first crash on a pilotless flight, and the follow up investigation is going to be intense

Everyone being scientific (nerdy), just have faith in the market. People won't like the idea, for a plane worth several hundred million and the good name of your company/brand having a qualified pilot (heck even 2) on standby at say ?500 a pop on a trans-atlantic flight is a no brainer investment even if they do SFA


...which is kind of EP's point

I'd be happy to fly in one. About half of all plane crashes are down to pilot error, the single biggest cause. When push comes to shove a pilot is only an organic computer, slower, less reliable and more prone to error than an inorganic one, and for all you know has just found out the copilot is having an affair with his wife.

nashoi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd be happy to fly in one. About half of all

> plane crashes are down to pilot error, the single

> biggest cause. When push comes to shove a pilot is

> only an organic computer, slower, less reliable

> and more prone to error than an inorganic one, and

> for all you know has just found out the copilot is

> having an affair with his wife.


Nashoi


You are the EDF's Mr Spock

The pilotless plane doesn't really interest me much - technically we're almost there anyway. And as quids says, it's not really going to save any money for the airlines, so where's the incentive?


What really does interest me is the steward-less plane. Automated food and booze vending direct to every seat. Or maybe a giant sushi-style conveyor belt going around the plane, carrying various items of food and drink. Could also be used to collect rubbish, and distribute landing cards and sick bags.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "In case of an emergency raise arms in air and

> scream until your pulped body is consumed in a

> conflagration of twisted metal and kerosene"



♫♫♪♪♫♫♪♫♫♪♪♫♫♫♪♪♪♫♫ Come fly with me, let's die, let's fly away ♫♫♪♪♫♫♪♫♫♪♪♫♫♫♪♪♪♫♫

> I'd be happy to fly in one. About half of all

> plane crashes are down to pilot error, the single

> biggest cause.


So about half are down to mechanical. Let's just say that's right.


The US Navy just launched an UA fighter jet. And if you look at their track record relating to the most common UA - the drones, it sure doesn't do anything for my confidence in unmanned aircraft. Take the drone attacks in Pakistan as an example, less than 2% hit their targets. Hence either the human remote programming and control is out of whack or there's a mechanical problem. In any event I'm glad I wont be on any US aircraft carrier when one of these jets misses it's target and goes careering.

We would like to Welcome you aboard this flight to New York..


This Plane is Pilotless and is being controlled and flown entirely by our onboard computers.


We would like to re-assure passengers that there is absolutely nothing that can go wrong ...


go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...go wrong ...


Foxy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
    • I see that there was a government consultation started in July 2024, a response, and then a revision to the National Planning Policy Framework, and then to the Green Belt guidance in February 2025, https://www.gov.uk/guidance/green-belt .  It includes the updates but doesn't give the nescient much clue of what was materially changed. There will probably be some good, and less good, summaries to be found. 
    • I think, from memory for LHR, we are under a holding pattern so if LHR is backed up we may get more planes overhead. There are multiple holding patterns so it is not always ours that is used and it generally depends on the wind direction as to which is used. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...