Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I do like the clean look of the forum, avatars can get pretty garish, especially when people start using flashing ones and all.

Plus I rather like that personality comes across from the writing, rather than selecting an image to represent you.


I would of course be Zoltar (from battle of the planets) MWAH HAH HAH HAH

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3280-avatars/#findComment-102443
Share on other sites

every so often some of the functionality lacking with this forum software bugs me... then I go to other forums where my eyes bleed


I love the clean look on here - plus it makes it less obvious to employers that it's a message board


BUt we could start an avatar thread no?.. in Fact...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3280-avatars/#findComment-102445
Share on other sites

Not sure the forum really looks like work anyway - at least in my case, where 'work' looks like either an email, a spreadsheet or a slide deck!


I think avatars are a bit naff, but probably because my experience of them is only from a website where they are used appallingly: the BBC parenting board. It's a classic example of really awful over-personalising where most of the contributors seem to have glitter tags, enormous photos, flashing count-down lists and the like. It's quite difficult to get to the messages in between the huge signatures.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3280-avatars/#findComment-102464
Share on other sites

I am dyslexic so find processing of large amounts of text difficult. I also tend to think visually so having a picture (either photo or image) helps to identify who is is writing what. I find reading email on Facebook easier because you have a visual reminder of who is writing.


But I hate animated images with a vengance - they detract me from what I am really trying to read.


So I am moderately in favour of them, provided there are static and limited in size. And people who don't like to see them to swithch them off when they read the forum.


[edited for typos - there are probably more :-)]

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3280-avatars/#findComment-103514
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Oooooh no no no! I agree that it is much easier to sneak a peak at work without avatars.However my main reason is that I rather like forming my own mental image of what people are like - and enjoy the surprise/ confirmation when I get to meet them at a gathering. I don't think I have ever met Snorky, Dulwich Mum, or Louisa - but I have wonderful images for each.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3280-avatars/#findComment-133291
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...