Jump to content

Recommended Posts

U do realise that Madge passed away several years ago and Harold is now shacked up wiv lou... so to spk :p


Currently staring at the collage of sexy men stuck on my desk and have completely over looked Josh Hartnett... I'd like to have him as me neighbour as hes nice and friendly and does wicked Ali G reject impressions (well he did the last time we hung out) lol

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> U do realise that Madge passed away several years

> ago and Harold is now shacked up wiv lou... so to

> spk :p

>

> Currently staring at the collage of sexy men stuck

> on my desk and have completely over looked Josh

> Hartnett... I'd like to have him as me neighbour

> as hes nice and friendly and does wicked Ali G

> reject impressions (well he did the last time we

> hung out) lol


Jeez KK this is a lousy choice, an Ali G impression? He's only good looking and will be of little use for sugar borrowing and chats. See below for the best combination. In my haughty opinion.

Nero Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pauline Prescott on one side, Julie Burchill on

> the other and Camilla over the road in the big

> houses.


Utter bloody perfection, one big hair, the second bigger opinions and the third you could always cadge a smoke off.

I salute your choices, Nero and if it was within my gift I'd declare you the winner.

Well done.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
    • Have you posted on Nextdoor? There's a big cat community on there. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...