Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know of anywhere in London (ideally easily accessible from Dulwich train) that administers the children?s chicken pox vaccines, ideally on weekdays? Obviously I realise this is a private treatment as it is not part of the UK?s immunisation program.


Medicentre in Victoria no longer treat children at all, and the Children?s Immunisation Centre on Harley Street only do Saturday appointments and charge a hefty ?50 ?registration fee? in addition to the cost of the vaccine.


Thank you!

I tried asking and got "why bother, all mine have had it, it isn't that bad". Actually, it can be - there is a reason it is part of the routine immunisation schedule in USA, Canada, Australia...

Happy to go private and avoid idiotic conversations like that. Which GP practice are you with, out of interest?

I didn't realise you could do this - this would make sense for us, as neither of us can afford to take a week off work at the moment.... Is that a bad reason for doing it? Possibly.

What are the side effects, does anyone know? And why don't they provide it on the NHS? Just because it's not considered a serious illness, or is the vaccine somehow...I don't know...inefficient.


No knowledge of medical issues so any advice gratefully received.

Been some interesting threads on this already if you search - but will give you the potted history as i understand it. The vaccine has been routinely given to all children in the usa and elsewhere for over 30 years - and as such is considered very safe - has been tested on a huge amount of children. The reason it isn't on the NHs is complex - there is an argument that if you immunize a whole generation of children then the older generation (who caught the virus as children) have a greater chance of catching shingles and more severely. As I understand it if you had chickenpox the virus is in your system and shingles is your body having an immune response to the virus. If you are regularly exposed to chickenpox however - it boosts your immunity each time you are exposed - giving ou less of a chance of getting shingles. Therefore if no one has chickenpox - you will never get the boost effect. The other reason I've read about for not introducing the chicken pox vaccine - which to me seems even more plausible - is that the powers that be have decided to focus their attention on getting people to get the mmr vaccine as a priority over trying to convince people to immunize against chicken pox. Probably a major factor is also that since people aren't clamouring for it and see chicken pox as 'not too bad' there's no impetus to spend extra money on a programme of vaccination.
Yes my understanding is similar to renrens. In addition, I understand an economic decision was taken by the nhs that the cost to the economy of parental time off work is less than the cost of vaccinating all children against a disease that is non fatal. I am definitely getting my kids done.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-22335511


It's the older population and shingles which is a bigger problem than children with chickenpox and so this is why the jab is being introduced to over 70's, if the jab was introduced to babies it would take 100yrs to eradicate the more problematic shingles - as said by the imms co-ordinater of the trust I work for.

  • 1 year later...
I would avoid southlondontravelcentre.com like the plague! Took my two year old for the chicken pox jab, the doctor was awful and having waited an hour he literally grabbed my son's arm and rammed the needle in. Patients were walking out of the clinic complaining how terribly it was run saying they would never be back. I will never go back either! Don't chance it, horrible people on reception, long waiting times and terrible service.
I recently had my almost 4 yr old and almost 2 yr old vaccinated at the Fleet Street Clinic. Very easy to get to Denmark Hill to City Thames Link and then a short pootle down Fleet Street. Doctor was excellent with the boys and neither suffered any side effects. My reasoning was also selfish - was just about to have a new baby, and couldn't face two ill children at the same time. There's a Strada nearby and St. Paul's to distract them afterwards.

nzmummy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would avoid southlondontravelcentre.com like the

> plague! Took my two year old for the chicken pox

> jab, the doctor was awful and having waited an

> hour he literally grabbed my son's arm and rammed

> the needle in. Patients were walking out of the

> clinic complaining how terribly it was run saying

> they would never be back. I will never go back

> either! Don't chance it, horrible people on

> reception, long waiting times and terrible

> service.


Oh what a shame! :-( I had my daughter vaccinated there not long ago. It was a Saturday, we were the only patients, and the doctor was lovely. I wonder what's changed? New management?

My kids had the pox recently and I ended up doing a bit of research into it and the vacination, a recent review found little evidence for it increasing shingles but this still seems to be the official reason for not giving it here. blog post with links about it here if anyone is interested (quite long I'm afraid!):

http://www.southwarkbelle.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/some-poxy-questions-why-doesnt-uk.html


When I (alas too late) looked into clinics the one of Fleet street seemed to be about the cheapest and easieist to get to, though still pretty expensive given that a friend had it done for 24USD in a fancy New York clinic!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...