Jump to content

Recommended Posts

for god's sake, what's wrong with you people? is it not enough that we have to deal with periods and childbirth and where to buy the organic sorrel and pandering to man-flu without having to worry about the size of our arses as well???


I don't see what the size of a woman's arse has to do with anything - women aren't men - their brains aren't in their trousers. I'm out of here and not coming back - you can shove it up your @rse... and f*ck off while you're at it (not sure I quoted that correctly)


*flounces with a swish of a particularly flouncy multi-layered chiffon skirt"


s'no good, I just haven't got the vitriol in me today, but I thank you fish, I really do for your kind efforts on my behalf

RosieH Wrote:


>

> *flounces with a swish of a particularly flouncy

> multi-layered chiffon skirt"

>


Darling RosieH ... I think we can now see where the problem lies. Flouncy multi-layered skirts only work on Sienna Miller (who wants to give the illusion of a large backside)....

You need to squeeze that delicious rump into a J-Lo style pair of hotpants and hit Lordship Lane with an alcopop in your hand.



Omigod... did I really just use the word rump? Three days in the North and I have had a personality change.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> for god's sake, what's wrong with you people? is

> it not enough that we have to deal with periods

> and childbirth and where to buy the organic sorrel

> and pandering to man-flu without having to worry

> about the size of our arses as well???

>

> I don't see what the size of a woman's arse has to

> do with anything - women aren't men - their brains

> aren't in their trousers. I'm out of here and not

> coming back - you can shove it up your @rse... and

> f*ck off while you're at it (not sure I quoted

> that correctly)

>

> *flounces with a swish of a particularly flouncy

> multi-layered chiffon skirt"

>

> s'no good, I just haven't got the vitriol in me

> today, but I thank you fish, I really do for your

> kind efforts on my behalf



You are very welcome. :)-D

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> for god's sake, what's wrong with you people? is

> it not enough that we have to deal with periods

> and childbirth and where to buy the organic sorrel

> and pandering to man-flu without having to worry

> about the size of our arses as well???

>

> I don't see what the size of a woman's arse has to

> do with anything - women aren't men - their brains

> aren't in their trousers. I'm out of here and not

> coming back - you can shove it up your @rse... and

> f*ck off while you're at it (not sure I quoted

> that correctly)

>

> *flounces with a swish of a particularly flouncy

> multi-layered chiffon skirt"

>

> s'no good, I just haven't got the vitriol in me

> today, but I thank you fish, I really do for your

> kind efforts on my behalf


*Claps*

Good form.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was ME who mentioned it in top 10 complaints -

> the thread asked for the top 10 complaints IN E

> Dulwich so I thought it was worth a mention.

>

> I'd flounce out myself but obviously given the

> size of it I'd only lose balance and fall over.



Hey Ms B, didn't mean to steal your thunder - the size of women's arses was the one topic that almost caused me to flounce off on an earlier thread about Harriet Harman

I saw a huge one today bending over one of the tables in Cafe Nero. I'm not even sure that there was anyone attached to it, my Coffee was sucked into its increasingly erratic orbit as it wobbled this way and that putting the Italian Barista through the window and scattering a mound of muffins to the 4 corners of the cafe. They're a menace!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...