Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*cough, ahem, HHHHHUUuuhhhhmmmmm*


?arrgggghhhhh? I reckons thaaat'll be the interview in the baaaag, then.

I knows fer a fact my eye contact impresses on these occasions. My good left un has quite a gleam, but when I lifts the patch off'n my right un, it fair freezes 'em, so it does.


They'll 'ave 'ad sight of my CV. Cut Very, hand right, leg left, below knee. An' I'll lay to that.


So, is it doubloons, per diem? Or share of trove?


I'm versatile, so I am and will be comfortable in the roles of brigand, cook, general swab or casual mayhemist.


Awaiting the Capn's pleasure.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The job has been deleted from the site. Do tell,

> what was it!


What! Couldn't ee tell from my job application what t'mission were?


Still Rose of Peckham I forgive ee, we'll tavern-meet on my safe return and of gin you'll have your fill, I'm not a man afeard of lightening his purse when it's laden after a successful voyage.

Trinkets too shall you have and plentiful, mark me.


Wish me well, mistress.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Im nosey too... wots the deal?


What! Couldn't ee tell from my job application what t'mission were?


Still KalamityKel I forgive ee, we'll tavern-meet on my safe return and of gin you'll have your fill, I'm not a man afeard of lightening his purse when it's laden after a successful voyage.

Trinkets too shall you have and plentiful, mark me.


Wish me well, mistress.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Still KalamityKel I forgive ee, we'll

> tavern-meet

> > on my safe return and of gin you'll have your

> > fill

>

> Has the rum gone? How disappointing :-(



AAaarr Right! Mistress Kel, rum, now be it? Then RUM SHALL IT BE! And no less trinkets for the matter.


But ee'll ha' to gi'mmee a time a'fore wi' Rose of Peckham, 'er of the gin.

A'fore I use up my ration of apostrophes.


Cap'n be stric' on the matter.


Damn his eye.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...