Jump to content

Recommended Posts

bawdy-nan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> its a lovely place to sit outside and while

> away a morning.


Ahh, a voice of infinite reason! Where's the rush, people? If it were in France, you'd love it and say it has charm.. 'Fickle' is one word extremely apt for the residents of ED!

Fuschia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hah. I just this minute received an email, dated

> 30th May but hitherto lost in the ether, I

> presume, apologising for what happened!

>

> I eat my words!


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Why is it always the emails (and mobile messages) guaranteed to cause most inconvenience/embarrassment if you don't receive them which go into some black hole for several days between the sender and recipient?


And where do they go ?!?!?!

> Where's the rush,

> people? If it were in France, you'd love it and

> say it has charm.. 'Fickle' is one word extremely

> apt for the residents of ED!


Ahh, but if I were in France, I'd be on holiday... and therefore wouldn't mind the wait so much! I don't think there's anything fickle about not wanting to wait 40 mins or whatever for your lunch.


It would be nice if the owners could come on the forum and tell us what they're doing to improve the service. Surely it's also in their interests to turn the tables over a bit more quickly?

McDonald's in Peckham's reliably quick!!


Agreed though it'd be nice if BMC came on the forum to have a word, like Kate from G&B did when they received a lot of flak. It's good publicity and won G&B a few fans; so much better than having a go at the Admin* behind the scenes or telling customers what miseries they were like another proprietor did once.


* capitalised for he is the local deity

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The BMC has always had rubbish service

>

> Some pople like the "charm" of it, I just go

> elsewhere


it is one of those overrated places that I just dont get


and the tiles on the pation are a menace when theyre wet - surprised theres not been a no win/ no fee claim against them yet.


actually its wet today ...Im off to the BMC then onto casualty at Kings

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


so much better than having

> a go at the Admin* behind the scenes or telling

> customers what miseries they were like another

> proprietor did once.

>


Mockney, can you point me to the post that states the owners approached the admin behind the scenes? I cannot find a reference to it.

eccentric Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mockney piers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> so much better than having

> > a go at the Admin* behind the scenes or telling

> > customers what miseries they were like another

> > proprietor did once.

> >

>

> Mockney, can you point me to the post that states

> the owners approached the admin behind the scenes?

> I cannot find a reference to it.

I've been going to the Blue Mountain cafe for quite some time and have generally found it to be great. I like the ambience and the staff. Must admit that I generally go for quiet times when I can be assured there will be little trouble getting a table or being served. And I usually go for coffee and cakes rather than cooked food. Having young kids myself I can sympathise with Fuschia and her sense of being disappointed when she took a precious moment for a quick treat.

But taking this to the general, I have seen some pretty rude behaviour from patrons in there. Some take that haughty "I am the customer and you must serve me" approach and it rather bugs me. If I was the waiter, or the proprietor I'd be inclined to go slow on the rude punter on table 4. The BMC seems a very successful cafe and can probably afford to lose a few customers. Perhaps its their way of flushing out the more demanding ones.

citizenED Wrote: I have seen some

> pretty rude behaviour from patrons in there. Some

> take that haughty "I am the customer and you must

> serve me" approach and it rather bugs me. If I was

> the waiter, or the proprietor I'd be inclined to

> go slow on the rude punter on table 4. The BMC

> seems a very successful cafe and can probably

> afford to lose a few customers. Perhaps its their

> way of flushing out the more demanding ones.



I can assure you we weren't at all rude, certainly not when we went in and ordered, and not even when we left before our food arrived!

Tazzi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Citizen i could not have put it better myself,

> some residents of ED think they can be rude to

> staff, i have seen it myself and its really unfair

> to be spoken to rudely. I can think of a couple on

> this forum.


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


I don't think there has ever been any suggestion that Fuchsia had to wait half an hour to be served because she was rude to BMC staff??


:-S


Edited to say: Sorry posted at same time as Fuchsia :-$

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...