Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Several places have sold recently in the area,

> including a place I was watching on Oakhurst

> Grove. It's just a question of pricing your

> property realistically. However, the agents

> presumably want to keep prices as high as they

> can, and seem to be marketing properties at prices

> which they will never possibly acheive.


Agents aren't responsible for setting unrealistic prices - it's the vendors. They look at similar properties on rightmove (inevitably browsing all the overpriced stuff that hasn't sold) and set their prices accordingly. Result: they end up stuck on the market as well. Only those vendors who undercut the competition are getting sales. Agents are now in the business of talking down prices in order to get things moving, as they're much more interested in maintaining volume of sales rather than prices. Though saying that, there are doubtless a few agents who encourage silly pricing in order to get the instruction, only to let the property languish on the market for six weeks or so before telling the vendor they need to cut the price by 10%.


Some places are selling at the moment, but only if they are priced low or the vendor has no choice about moving and has to accept a low offer. In a housing market crash, people keep buying all the way to the bottom of the cycle, but prices fall anyway because there isn't enough demand to erode the growing supply.

macroban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> An educated friend tells me this is following the

> K?bler-Ross model.



So paraphrased:


Denial:

Example - "It will be fine, the house will sell easily"

Anger:

Example - "Why me? Why couldnt the crunch have happened a few months later!"

Bargaining:

Example - "Just let the market hold long enough for it to sell at the right time"

Depression:

Example - "OMG I am going to lose so much that I didnt have to"

Acceptance:

Example - "Oh sod it, lets sell at any price"

Does anyone have any suggestions as to what kind of commission deal can currently be struck with estate agents in East Dulwich when selling houses ? An advisor on the radio last night was suggesting people should negotiate for 0.5% of selling price! Can this really be so?


About 1 per cent feels about right to me.


What do others think?

I'd like to sell my 3 bedroomed house (+ a study), if anybody would like to buy it for ?650,000. It is very nice - even the Estate Agents said so.


A couple of weeks ago, we had 8 houses to sell on our road - all of which have been on the market for several months.


One of my neighbours has dropped theirs from ?750k to ?700k but still no-one is interested.


Estate Agents told us to gratefully accept an offer, or sit still for at least 2 years.

Mrs Iggy Pop Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd like to sell my 3 bedroomed house (+ a study),

> if anybody would like to buy it for ?650,000. It

> is very nice - even the Estate Agents said so.

>

> A couple of weeks ago, we had 8 houses to sell on

> our road - all of which have been on the market

> for several months.

>

> One of my neighbours has dropped theirs from ?750k

> to ?700k but still no-one is interested.

>

> Estate Agents told us to gratefully accept an

> offer, or sit still for at least 2 years.



hi, i've sent you a personal message

wow, i am still staggered not at house prices ... but by the fact that people like kirsty and 'what's his face, not son of the rich family' are paid to tell people the bl**dy obvious about selling a house. keep it clean?? decorate?? look smart ... what is this a degree in estate agentology?

What is more laughable is Kirsty and Phil's current crusade against stamp duty, using it as a reason people aren't buying at the moment.


What they fail to remember is that stamp duty didn't stop people buying last year when prices were just as high.


They argue a price fall is bad - when in reality the stamp duty of 1% can easily be "saved" by a price reduction of only 1%, so a 20% fall is much more beneficial for first time buyers than the scrapping of stamp duty.


If anything stamp duty should have been raised much higher 5 years ago to stop the ridiculous price growth.


Plus foreign nationals paying an additional 20% or suchlike in stamp duty.


Their maths is quite staggeringly upside down, and such a vested interest it shouldn't be allowed on television.

We did view a comedy house in ED before we bought. I almost laughed in their faces.


Bowls of pot pourris everywhere.

'Best of classical Music' playing (free with the Daily Mail, I suspect)

Scattercushions angled to perfection.

Mario Testino on the coffee table.

My favourite was a bowl of fruit - in the bedroom

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or doubling stamp duty on each additional property

> you buy, going up exponentially.

>

> But that may have stood in the way of so many MPs

> and local councillors building up their little

> buy-to-let empires.



Exactly. There are so many ways that would be a fair stamp duty system which works on the basis that people only need one house to live in.


As you say, too many noses in too many troughs. Oink Oink.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can’t say I approve but equally staff can vote with their feet. Cabs to collect and deliver - not bad.Maybe Gail’s know something none of us do… Having said that, sure those that are walking in and around Dulwich might prefer cake, hot drinks etc in a venue that is not a pub with the noise from over loud punters… so guess one waits and sees…  Do take some pics or let us know if people are popping in… my guess is yes… 
    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Gails, drawing attention to Dulwich Gails being open on Christmas Day.
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...